The Human Psyche

The Human Psyche A safe space to explore mental health, autism, cognitive dysfunction & psychology. Breaking stigma, spreading awareness & supporting minds one post at a time.

Your mind matters. You are not alone.

The Power of First Impressions: Inside the Halo EffectHave You Ever Judged Someone Before Really Knowing Them?Imagine tw...
21/10/2026

The Power of First Impressions: Inside the Halo Effect

Have You Ever Judged Someone Before Really Knowing Them?

Imagine two new students joining your class. One seems confident and friendly. On her first day, she smiles, greets everyone politely, and speaks with confidence. Almost immediately, people assume she must also be intelligent, kind, and well-mannered.

Now imagine another student who seems quiet, cold, or distant. Without knowing her at all, people may assume she is less intelligent or less friendly.

But here’s the question - how do we know any of this is actually true?

Most of the time, we don’t. Yet our minds quickly build a whole picture of a person from just one noticeable trait. This tendency is called the Halo Effect - a cognitive bias in which our overall impression of someone (a person, a company, even a product) shapes how we judge their other, unrelated qualities.

So, What Exactly Is the Halo Effect?

The Halo Effect happens when one standout positive trait quietly colors how we judge everything else about a person. In the first example, the student’s warmth and confidence lead us to assume she’s also intelligent or competent, even though we have no real evidence for that.

She may genuinely be friendly. But whether she’s competent, hardworking, or good at anything else is still unknown. Our mind just lets one good quality cast a kind of “halo” over the whole person.

The reverse happens too. A single negative trait can just as easily color everything else about someone - a tendency known as the Horn Effect (or the reverse Halo Effect). It sounds like this:

“He seemed rude once, so he must be an unfriendly, bad person.”

Whether the halo is positive or negative, the problem is the same: we’re judging a person’s many qualities based on just one, without enough evidence to back it up.

Are We Even Aware When It Happens?

Here’s the unsettling part - the Halo Effect usually happens without us realizing it.

A well-known study by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated this. Students watched the same instructor in two different interviews - in one, he came across as warm and friendly; in the other, cold and distant. Afterward, students rated him on several unrelated traits. Their ratings shifted depending on which version of him they’d seen - even though nothing about his actual traits had changed. More strikingly, the students had no idea their overall impression had shaped their judgment at all.

This is what makes the Halo Effect more than just “judging people too quickly.” It shows that one impression can quietly reshape how we interpret everything else we learn about a person - while we go on believing we judged each quality on its own merit.

How Does It Show Up in Everyday Life?

The Halo Effect doesn’t just live in psychology studies - it follows us through daily life:

In the classroom - a high-performing student is often assumed to be well-mannered and responsible too.

In the workplace - a confident employee is often judged as more competent, whether or not the two are related.

On social media - an attractive or polished online presence can make someone seem more trustworthy or successful.

In relationships - we may overlook someone’s flaws because we like them, or dismiss their good qualities because of one bad first impression.

This is where the effect turns into something more troubling. Left unchecked, it can lead to:

Biased judgments - sizing someone up by one trait instead of the whole person.

Poor decisions - letting a first impression override the evidence.

Unfair evaluations - giving someone more, or less, credit than they’ve actually earned.

Blind spots - ignoring behavior that doesn’t fit the story we’ve already built about them.

If we admire someone, we tend to explain away their mistakes. If we dislike someone, even their good actions can start to look suspicious. And because this all happens quietly, our judgments feel fair - even when a single impression is doing all the work behind the scenes.

Bit by bit, this is how the Halo Effect ends up shaping our relationships - sometimes for the better, often for the worse.

So, How Can We Catch Ourselves Doing It?

The Halo Effect is hard to switch off completely - it works quietly, beneath conscious awareness. But we can get better at noticing it.

Pause before judging. Ask yourself: “What do I actually know about this person?” Separate what you’ve truly observed from what you’ve simply assumed.

Judge each quality on its own. One trait doesn’t define the whole person. Instead of thinking “She's friendly, so she must be competent,” ask, “What evidence do I actually have about her competence?”

Don’t let first impressions become final verdicts. They’re powerful, but limited - and not always accurate. Give yourself time to gather more information, and stay open to evidence that challenges your first read.

Above all, accept that you may simply not know enough yet. People are more complicated than any single impression can capture.

In conclusion, the Halo Effect shows how easily one trait can hijack the way we judge everything else about a person. A smile, a moment of confidence, even a single awkward first meeting - any of these can quietly shape our opinion of someone, often without us ever noticing. So next time you catch yourself forming a snap judgment, pause and ask: “Am I judging this person on evidence - or letting one impression speak for everything else?”

Sometimes, the fairest thing we can say is simply: “Maybe I don’t know enough yet.”

Content Credit:
Ramisha Faria
Session: 24-25
Tahmida Binte Shiraj
Session: 23-24

Poster Credit:
Fahim Abrar
Session:2023-2024

Student Presentation Session: 08 |"The Psychology of Influence and Relative Terms"Our behaviors and decisions are rarely...
16/10/2026

Student Presentation Session: 08 |

"The Psychology of Influence and Relative Terms"
Our behaviors and decisions are rarely made in a vacuum; they are constantly shaped by the psychological forces around us. Understanding how minds are guided, swayed, or controlled is key to navigating the modern world. Join us for our 8th Student Presentation as we delve into a fundamental dimension of human interaction: "The Psychology of Influence and Relative Terms."

Date: 17-10-2026
Time: 4.30 PM (BST)

Google Meet joining info
Video call link: https://meet.google.com/dnh-tour-afx

We are delighted to introduce our presenters:

Rashid Mujahid (Department of Psychology, University of Chittagong, Session 2025–26)

Ucchal Aditya Prokhor Bin Amir.(Department of Psychology, University of Chittagong, Session 2025–26)

Together, they will explore the mechanics of human compliance, detailing the subtle power of social influence, the ethical framework of persuasion, and the deceptive dynamics of manipulation. Be part of the conversation. Learn, reflect, and grow with us.
The Human Psyche 💙



*যে কষ্ট দেখা যায় না: প্রত্যাখ্যানের মনস্তত্ত্ব*কোনো চাকরির ইন্টারভিউতে “না” শোনা, প্রিয় মানুষের কাছ থেকে প্রত্যাখ্যাত...
10/10/2026

*যে কষ্ট দেখা যায় না: প্রত্যাখ্যানের মনস্তত্ত্ব*

কোনো চাকরির ইন্টারভিউতে “না” শোনা, প্রিয় মানুষের কাছ থেকে প্রত্যাখ্যাত হওয়া, কিংবা বন্ধুদের আড্ডায় হঠাৎ নিজেকে অবহেলিত মনে হওয়া - ঘটনাগুলো আলাদা হলেও অনুভূতিটা অনেক সময় একই রকম। বুকের ভেতর চাপ লাগা, মন খারাপ হয়ে যাওয়া, কিংবা মনে হওয়া - “আমার ভেতরে যেন কিছু একটা ভেঙে গেল।”

*কিন্তু একটা সামাজিক ঘটনা আমাদের এতটা বাস্তব কষ্ট দেয় কেন?*

মনোবিজ্ঞান ও স্নায়ুবিজ্ঞানের গবেষণা বলছে, এর পেছনে রয়েছে আমাদের মস্তিষ্কের কিছু গুরুত্বপূর্ণ কার্যপ্রক্রিয়া সামাজিক প্রত্যাখ্যানের সময় মস্তিষ্কের Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex (dACC) এবং Anterior Insula-এর মতো কিছু অঞ্চল সক্রিয় হয়ে ওঠে। মজার বিষয় হলো, এই অঞ্চলগুলো শারীরিক ব্যথা প্রক্রিয়াজাত করার সঙ্গেও সম্পর্কিত। তাই রিজেকশনের কষ্টকে শুধু “মনের ব্যাপার” বলে উড়িয়ে দেওয়া ঠিক নয়।
গবেষক Naomi Eisenberger এবং তাঁর সহকর্মীদের বিখ্যাত “Cyberball” গবেষণায় দেখা গেছে, মানুষ যখন নিজেকে কোনো সামাজিক পরিস্থিতি থেকে বাদ পড়েছে বলে অনুভব করে, তখন মস্তিষ্ক অনেকটা শারীরিক ব্যথার মতোই প্রতিক্রিয়া দেখায়। অর্থাৎ, সামাজিক কষ্ট আমাদের কাছে বাস্তব কষ্ট হিসেবেই অনুভূত হয়।

*মস্তিষ্ক রিজেকশনকে এত গুরুত্ব দেয় কেন?*

এর উত্তর পাওয়া যায় Evolutionary Psychology বা বিবর্তনমূলক মনোবিজ্ঞানে। হাজার হাজার বছর আগে মানুষের বেঁচে থাকা অনেকটাই দলভিত্তিক কার্যক্রমের ওপর নির্ভর করত। একা হয়ে গেলে খাবার পাওয়া, নিরাপদ থাকা কিংবা বিপদ মোকাবিলা করা কঠিন হয়ে যেত। তাই মানুষের মস্তিষ্ক ধীরে ধীরে এমনভাবে গড়ে উঠেছে যে, সামাজিক সংযোগ হারানোর সংকেতকে সে গুরুত্বের সঙ্গেই নেয়।
মনোবিজ্ঞানী *Roy Baumeister ও Mark Leary* - এর _*“Need to Belong”_* তত্ত্ব অনুযায়ী, অন্য মানুষের সঙ্গে অর্থপূর্ণ সম্পর্ক তৈরি করা মানুষের একটি মৌলিক মানসিক প্রয়োজনীয়তা। তাই কেউ আমাদের প্রত্যাখ্যান করলে সেটা শুধু একটি সুযোগ হারানোর অনুভূতি নয়, বরং নিজের সামাজিক অবস্থান নিয়েও অস্বস্তি তৈরি করতে পারে।
আজকের দিনে কোনো চাকরিতে সুযোগ না পাওয়া বা বন্ধুর মেসেজের উত্তর না পাওয়া জীবন-মরণের বিষয় নয়। কিন্তু আমাদের মস্তিষ্ক এখনো সামাজিক গ্রহণযোগ্যতাকে খুব গুরুত্বের চোখে দেখে। ফলে একটি “না” অনেক সময় সামাজিক হুমকি বা Social Threat হিসেবে অনুভূত হয়।

*কেন কিছু রিজেকশন এত সহজে ভুলে যাওয়া যায় না?*

১. Rumination - এখানে গুরুত্বপূর্ণ ভূমিকা রাখে। কথায় বলে, *"Rumination is stress without resolution". অর্থ্যাৎ, সমাধান ছাড়াই একই চিন্তা বা ঘটনা বারবার মাথার মধ্যে ঘুরতে থাকা। যেমন, “আমি কেন রিজেক্ট হলাম?”, “আমি কি যথেষ্ট ভালো না?”, “আমি কি কোনো ভুল করেছি?” এই ধরনের প্রশ্ন যখন বারবার মনে আসে, তখন মস্তিষ্ক বারবার একই আবেগকে সক্রিয় করতে থাকে। ফলে কষ্ট দীর্ঘস্থায়ী হয়ে যায়।
২. Negativity Bias ও কাজ করে। আমাদের মস্তিষ্ক স্বাভাবিকভাবেই নেতিবাচক অভিজ্ঞতাকে ইতিবাচক অভিজ্ঞতার তুলনায় বেশি গুরুত্ব দিয়ে মনে রাখে। এজন্যই হয়তো দশজন আপনার প্রশংসা করেছে, কিন্তু একজনের সমালোচনাই সারাদিন মাথায় ঘুরতে থাকে।
৩. Rejection Sensitivity নামের একটি মনোবৈজ্ঞানিক ধারণাও আছে। কিছু মানুষ অতীত অভিজ্ঞতার কারণে প্রত্যাখ্যানের সম্ভাবনার ব্যাপারে বেশি সতর্ক থাকে। ফলে ছোটখাটো অবহেলাকেও তারা অনেক বড় প্রত্যাখ্যান হিসেবে অনুভব করে ফেলে।

*আমাদের সংস্কৃতিতে প্রত্যাখ্যান কেন আরও বেশি কষ্ট দিতে পারে?*

বাংলাদেশসহ দক্ষিণ এশিয়ার সমাজগুলো তুলনামূলকভাবে Collectivist Culture বা দলকেন্দ্রিক সংস্কৃতির অন্তর্ভুক্ত। এখানে পরিবার, আত্মীয়স্বজন, সামাজিক মর্যাদা এবং অন্যদের মতামত অনেক গুরুত্বপূর্ণ ভূমিকা পালন করে। তাই অনেক সময় একটি রিজেকশন শুধু ব্যক্তিগত ব্যর্থতা হিসেবে নয়, বরং *“মানুষ কী ভাববে?”* - এই চিন্তার সঙ্গেও জড়িয়ে যায়। যেমন:
• চাকরি না পাওয়া মানে শুধু চাকরি না পাওয়া নয়; পরিবারের প্রত্যাশা পূরণ করতে না পারার ভয়ও থাকতে পারে।
• সম্পর্ক ভেঙে যাওয়া মানে শুধু একজন মানুষকে হারানো নয়; সামাজিক বিচার বা সমালোচনার ভয়ও যুক্ত হতে পারে।
• বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়ে চান্স না পাওয়া মানে শুধু একটি প্রতিষ্ঠানে ভর্তি না হওয়া নয়; আত্মীয়দের প্রশ্নের মুখোমুখি হওয়ার চাপও তৈরি হতে পারে।
এই সামাজিক চাপ অনেক সময় রিজেকশনের কষ্টকে আরও তীব্র করে তোলে।

*রিজেকশনে কষ্ট পাওয়া কি দুর্বলতার লক্ষণ?*

একদমই না।

Self-Esteem, Belongingness এবং Social Connection - এই তিনটি বিষয় মানুষের মানসিক সুস্থতার সঙ্গে গভীরভাবে সম্পর্কিত। তাই প্রত্যাখ্যানের পর কষ্ট পাওয়া আসলে একটি স্বাভাবিক মানসিক প্রতিক্রিয়া।
কষ্ট পাওয়া মানে আপনি দুর্বল নন। বরং এটি দেখায় যে সম্পর্ক, গ্রহণযোগ্যতা এবং নিজের জায়গাটা আপনার কাছে গুরুত্বপূর্ণ।

*কিন্তু একটি “না” কি সত্যিই আপনার যোগ্যতা নির্ধারণ করে?*

একদমই না। মনোবিজ্ঞানে Fundamental Attribution Error নামে একটি ধারণা আছে। আমরা অনেক সময় একটি ঘটনার ভিত্তিতে নিজের পুরো ব্যক্তিত্ব বা যোগ্যতা বিচার করে ফেলি। যেমন:
• একটি চাকরির ইন্টারভিউতে ব্যর্থ হওয়া মানেই আমি অযোগ্য নই।
• একটি সম্পর্কে প্রত্যাখ্যাত হওয়া মানেই আমি ভালোবাসার অযোগ্য নই।
• একটি সুযোগ হারানো মানেই আমার ভবিষ্যৎ শেষ হয়ে যায়নি।
অনেক সময় রিজেকশন হয় পরিস্থিতি, সময়, প্রয়োজন বা সামঞ্জস্যের কারণে - শুধু যোগ্যতার কারণে নয়।

*রিজেকশনের পর কী করা যেতে পারে?*

প্রথমত, নিজের অনুভূতিকে অস্বীকার না করে স্বীকার করা শিখতে হবে। মন খারাপ হলে নিজেকে কিছুটা সময় দিতে হবে।
দ্বিতীয়ত, নিজের প্রতি সহানুভূতিশীল হওয়া (Self-Compassion)। রিজেকশনের পর নিজেকে দোষারোপ করার বদলে নিজের সঙ্গে সেভাবেই কথা বলতে হবে, যেভাবে আমরা কাছের কোনো বন্ধুর সঙ্গে বলি। মনে রাখতে হবে, একটি প্রত্যাখ্যান আমাদের পুরো পরিচয় বা মূল্য নির্ধারণ করে না।
তৃতীয়ত, Rumination-এর চক্রে আটকে গেলে সচেতনভাবে মনোযোগ অন্যদিকে ঘোরাতে হবে। ব্যায়াম, পড়াশোনা, সৃজনশীল কাজ, প্রার্থনা, জার্নাল লেখা কিংবা কাছের কারও সঙ্গে কথা বলা - এসব সাহায্য করতে পারে।
চতুর্থত, ঘটনাটিকে নিজের পরিচয়ের অংশ না বানিয়ে একটি অভিজ্ঞতা হিসেবে দেখার চেষ্টা করতে হবে। মনোবিজ্ঞানী *Carol Dweck-এর Growth Mindset* ধারণা অনুযায়ী, ব্যর্থতা বা প্রত্যাখ্যানকে স্থায়ী পরিচয় নয় বরং শেখার সুযোগ হিসেবে দেখলে, মানসিকভাবে দ্রুত ঘুরে দাঁড়ানো সহজ হয়ে ওঠে।

*সবশেষে*
একটি “না” হয়তো কষ্ট দেয় - কারণ মানুষ হিসেবে আমরা সংযোগ চাই, সম্পর্ক চাই, গ্রহণযোগ্যতা চাই, এবং গুরুত্বপূর্ণ হতে চাই। তবে এর মানে এই নয় যে একটি রিজেকশনই আমার মূল্য ঠিক করে দেবে।

আজকের প্রত্যাখ্যান আমাদের জীবনের শেষ অধ্যায় নয়। হয়তো সেটাই এমন একটি নতুন পথের শুরু, যেটা আমরা এখনো দেখতে পাচ্ছি না।
কারণ কখনো কখনো জীবনের সবচেয়ে গুরুত্বপূর্ণ “ *হ্যাঁ* ” শুরু হয় একটি অপ্রত্যাশিত *“না”* থেকে।

Content Credit: Sanjida Bashar
Session: 24-25
Poster Credit: Ucchal Aditya Prokhor Bin Amir
Session: 25-26

The Bystander EffectWho Will Step Forward?"Whenever a tragic event appears on the news, a question almost always comes t...
02/10/2026

The Bystander Effect

Who Will Step Forward?

"Whenever a tragic event appears on the news, a question almost always comes to our mind — 'If so many people witnessed the incident, why didn't anyone help?'"

Imagine that with dozens of people present, someone would have stepped forward. Surprisingly, psychology suggests the opposite. Sometimes the more witnesses there are, the less likely anyone is to help.

This silent paradox is known as the Bystander Effect, which is one of the most fascinating and unsettling discoveries in social psychology. In short – A Crowd Doesn’t Always Mean Safety.

The Bystander Effect explains that the presence of other people can sometimes reduce an individual’s sense of personal responsibility to intervene. For instance, suppose a young woman suddenly faints at a crowded bus stoppage. For a moment, everyone notices. Some people slow down. Others only glance at each other. A few even take out their phones to record that situation or to do other stuff. Seconds turn into minutes, but still, no one takes the first step to help that young woman. This situation is a psychological trap that quietly shifts responsibility from one person to everyone; and therefore, to no one.

In such situations, there’s an invisible voice inside our minds which rarely asks, “Should I help?” Instead, it keeps on thinking:

“Has someone else already taken care of this?”

“What if I help and end up looking foolish?”

“If nobody seems worried, am I misunderstanding the situation?”

Such thoughts happen to come to our minds within seconds, often without us realizing it.

Why Does Our Brain Hesitate?

Psychologists John Darley & Bibb Latané developed the Bystander Effect Theory in the 1960s. Their research shows that when several people witness an emergency, an individual may be less likely to intervene than when they are alone.

They developed this theory based on many real-life examples, most famous among them associated with The Kitty Genovese Murder (1964). This 28-year-old woman was murdered in New York City. Initial newspaper reports claimed that numerous witnesses saw or heard the attack but failed to help or call the police. This story attracted enormous public attention and helped inspire Darley and Latané's research into why people sometimes fail to intervene when others are present. So, the case helped inspire research into bystander behavior, but it should not be presented as straightforward proof that 38 people watched a murder and simply refused to help.

Darley and Latané identified four key psychological processes behind this theory:

Diffusion of Responsibility: Responsibility behaves differently in a crowd. When we're the only witness, helping feels like our duty. But as more people gather, our sense of personal responsibility quietly fades. Everyone assumes someone else is more capable, closer, or already acting. Ironically, shared responsibility often becomes no responsibility at all.

Pluralistic Ignorance: Humans constantly observe one another for social cues. People look at others’ reactions to decide whether a situation is an ‘actual emergency’. If everyone appears calm, each person may assume that nothing is seriously wrong. An entire crowd can misread the same situation simply because everyone is copying everyone else's hesitation.

Evaluation Apprehension (Fear of Social Judgment): A person may hesitate because they are worried about acting incorrectly or being judged by others. Helping requires courage. Many people hesitate because they fear embarrassment more than inaction: "What if this isn't actually an emergency?" or "What if everyone laughs at me?” Although these fears seem small, they can be powerful enough to delay action when every second matters.

The 5-Step Decision-Making Process: Darley and Latané proposed that helping requires moving through several steps:

Noticing the event

Interpreting it as an emergency

Taking personal responsibility

Deciding how to help

Actually intervening

The Digital Bystander: A Modern Manifestation

The Bystander Effect no longer exists only on streets or in shopping malls — it has entered our phones. Someone posts a message saying they're struggling emotionally. Hundreds of people read it. Thousands react with an emoji. Yet very few send a private message asking, "Are you really okay?" Online, it's easy to believe that because so many others have seen the post, someone else must already be helping. Sometimes, nobody is.

The Bystander Effect doesn't only appear during emergencies. Silence is also a decision. It happens when:

A classmate is repeatedly bullied while others watch.

An employee is unfairly blamed during a meeting.

Someone is being harassed on public transport.

False information spreads online because everyone assumes someone else will correct it.

In these moments, doing nothing becomes a choice — even if it doesn't feel like one.

How Does It Affect Us?

The Bystander Effect doesn't just impact the person who needs help — it changes the way we act around others, and in critical situations, it can cause us to:

Pause when quick action is required.

Pass the responsibility to someone else instead of stepping in ourselves.

Stay quiet when someone is being treated unfairly or needs assistance.

Overlook issues because it seems like everyone else is ignoring them too.

Slowly become less likely to get involved, making not helping feel like the normal thing to do.

For the person who needs help, the silence of a crowd can feel like being rejected, ignored, or left completely alone.

How Do We Overcome It?

Psychology explains why people hesitate, but it doesn't excuse permanent inaction. To break the cycle and step forward:

Raise Awareness: The first step is simply becoming aware that the Bystander Effect exists.

Take Personal Ownership: Stop waiting for someone else. If you find yourself in an emergency, don't assume someone else has already taken action. Instead, take personal responsibility.

Direct Responsibility Specifically: If you are the one who needs help, avoid calling out vaguely to a crowd. Instead, point to a specific person and say, “You, in the blue shirt, please call an ambulance.” Research shows that assigning responsibility to one individual dramatically increases the likelihood that someone will respond.

Spark a Chain Reaction: One person’s courage often gives an entire crowd permission to act.

Perhaps the greatest lesson of the Bystander Effect isn't about crowds at all. It's about individuals. Every crowd is simply a collection of people waiting for someone to move first. The next time life places us among the many, we should remember this:

“It’s easy to be the one who watches. What matters is being the one who notices, understands, and steps forward.”

Content Credit:
Tahmida Binte Shiraj
Session :23-24
Department of psychology

Poster Credit:
Ucchal Aditya Prokhor Bin Amir
Session: 25-26
Department of psychology

Confirmation BiasWhy Is It So Painful to Admit When We’re Wrong?Think about how easily this happens in everyday life. Yo...
19/09/2026

Confirmation Bias

Why Is It So Painful to Admit When We’re Wrong?

Think about how easily this happens in everyday life. You read a headline that makes you furious,
hit 'share' immediately, and feel validated by fifty comments echoing your outrage. Ten minutes
later, a full fact-check reveals the headline was misleading, but you scroll right past it without a
second thought.
You didn't share the post because it was true; you shared it because it felt good to be right.
Admitting you were duped hurts, so your mind simply chooses to pretend the correction doesn't
exist.
This psychological phenomenon is known as Confirmation Bias. It is mainly the natural tendency to search for, trust, and remember information that matches what we already believe.
It is like a sneaky, built-in filter in our brain, a mental trick that makes us pick only the information we like. We happily accept facts that say "you were right," but when a fact suggests we're wrong, our brain ignores it or tries to disprove it. Instead of acting like neutral judges seeking the truth, we act like lawyers, cherry-picking facts that help us win our own argument.

Why Does It Happen?

It saves brain power: Your brain loves shortcuts. Fitting new information into what you already
know takes way less effort than rethinking your whole point of view. It's like taking the easy,
familiar route home instead of figuring out a new one even if the new route might be faster. It protects your feelings: Finding out you might be wrong feels uncomfortable. Looking for things you agree with feels safe and reassuring, similar to why we'd rather scroll past a harsh truth than sit with the sting of being wrong. It defends who you are: Our beliefs are deeply tied to our identity and the groups we belong to. Changing your mind can feel like losing a piece of yourself almost like admitting your favorite team played badly when you've spent years being their biggest fan.

How Does It Affect Us?

Confirmation bias quietly shapes our daily choices and damages how we think. In the short term, it
leads us to make poor decisions we ignore clear warning signs and focus only on information that
makes us feel good. In relationships, we instantly notice our partner's mistakes but overlook the
good things they do, sparking unnecessary arguments. Over the long term, this pattern deepens: it spreads fake news and rumors, as people quickly share posts simply because the content agrees with their beliefs without checking if it's true. For instance, someone might share a false post about a food causing illness because it matches what they already think, and even after the claim is debunked, they never delete it admitting the mistake would mean challenging their own belief. Left unchecked, confirmation bias stops us from thinking clearly, learning new things, and growing beyond our existing opinions.

Can We Reduce It?

Yes, you can easily break free from this mental trap with a little self-awareness. Whenever you
read something, ask yourself: "Am I looking for the real truth, or am I just trying to prove I'm right?"
Try to read different points of view and get into the habit of checking facts before believing them.
Remember, changing your mind when you learn new facts isn't a mistake it is actually a sign that
you are growing and becoming wiser.

"Truth will not always align with what we already believe, but having the courage to accept new
facts is what truly helps us grow. Changing your mind in the face of reality isn't a sign of weakness
it's a sign of wisdom and intellectual maturity."
So, ask yourself: when was the last time you learned a new fact and actually allowed it to
change your mind?

Content writer: Afiya Mubassira
Poster designer: Sajida Moryem

Student Presentation Session: 07 |  "Socialization"We do not become human entirely on our own. We are shaped by the worl...
15/08/2026

Student Presentation Session: 07 |
"Socialization"

We do not become human entirely on our own. We are shaped by the world around us. Understanding how society molds our minds, behaviors, and identities is key to understanding who we truly are.
Join us for our 7th Student Presentation as we delve into a fundamental dimension of human development:"Socialization"

Date: 15-08-2026
Time: 4 PM (BST)

Google Meet joining info
Video call link: https://meet.google.com/dnh-tour-afx

We are delighted to introduce our presenters :
Nuzhat Nahian
(Department of Psychology, University of Chittagong, Session 2025–26
Sidratul Muntaha Subata
(Department of Psychology, University of Chittagong, Session 2025–26)
Kazi Mahjuba
(Department of Psychology, University of Chittagong, Session 2025–26)

Together, they will explore the primary agents of socialization, how cultural norms influence personality, and the psychological impact of social formatting.Be part of the conversation. Learn, reflect, and grow with us.The Human Psyche 💙


Do you remember the poignant story of Taslima Begum—a single mother beaten to death by an angry mob outside a school in ...
13/08/2026

Do you remember the poignant story of Taslima Begum—a single mother beaten to death by an angry mob outside a school in Dhaka while simply inquiring about admission for her four-year-old child? Around that same time in July 2019, seven more innocent people were killed after social media rumors claimed children were being abducted as offerings for the Padma Bridge construction. There was no evidence and zero truth to the narrative—yet, fueled by collective terror, the rumor spiraled with fatal consequences.

Rumors like these spread rapidly and trigger serious social consequences. Rumors do not thrive because they provide facts; they thrive because they exploit core psychological vulnerabilities.

Psychologists identify several key underlying causes for why rumors originate, spread, and affect communities:

1. Uncertainty and Ambiguity:
Our minds naturally dislike uncertainty—in fact, the human brain perceives uncertainty as threat to survival. When facts aren't readily available, we create explanations to make sense of the situation. It is because we demand immediate answers for cognitive clarity, prioritizing fast explanations over accurate ones. If an event is deeply important to a community but lacks clear facts, rumor transmission expands exponentially.

2. High Anxiety and Fear:
Rumors are unconsciously crafted to hit raw emotional triggers, expressing latent anxieties and deep-seated prejudices. Fact-checking requires deliberate mental effort, but emotional reactions are instant and automatic. When an unverified story aligns with a fear or frustration we already carry, the mind uses that emotional resonance as a shortcut for truth. Spreading a warning—even a false one—serves as an emotional catharsis, allowing individuals to externalize their panic and feel like they are taking action to protect their group.

3. Reliance on Cognitive Shortcuts:
In fast-paced environments or high-stress situations, the brain experiences information overload. When overwhelmed, our capacity for critical reasoning drops significantly. During these times, we engage in low cognitive effort, accepting plausible-sounding stories at face value rather than analyzing evidence critically. It is not because of laziness. Instead it's a cognitive shortcut used by the brain called "heuristics"; mental shortcut in decision-making and problem-solving.

4. Confirmation Bias:
Confirmation bias is a mental shortcut that makes people far more likely to accept, remember, and share information that fits what they already believe. When a rumor aligns with an individual's habits, interests, or expectations, they accept it instantly. We naturally tend to fall for stories that favor our pre-existing fears, prejudices, or worldviews without demanding proof or verification.

5. Social Conformity:
Conformity is a powerful group behavior. It is the tendency to align your beliefs, actions, or decisions with group norms. As more people repeat the same narrative, an Information Cascade forms. Individuals begin overriding their personal skepticism because challenging the group’s shared belief feels less like critical thinking and more like a betrayal of community safety.

6. Personal Motives and Social Bonding:
Sharing exclusive or alarming news can foster conversation, build temporary social bonds, or elevate status within a group. In worse cases, rumors are intentionally spread for entertainment, attention, or to undermine an adversary's reputation.

Rumors thrive because they give a voice to our unspoken, collective fears. Recognizing these psychological triggers—from our tendency to take cognitive shortcuts to our fear of social isolation—is the first step toward breaking the chain of misinformation before it leads to communal harm. Reversing this trend demands both individual mindfulness and collective responsibility. To prevent the spread of rumors, we must cultivate a habit of emotion regulation, staying calm and rational under stress, fact-checking any news before believing and sharing. Promoting media literacy, encouraging respectful skepticism within social groups, and waiting for official verification can effectively dismantle information cascades before it breaks out collective fear.

Content Credit : Israt Zamila Ifa
Session :2025-26
Department of Psychology

Poster Credit : Fardin Ahmed
Session : 2023-24
Department of Psychology

Ever looked at a familiar word so long it stopped making sense? That's Jamais vu the strange opposite of déjà vu. Your b...
10/08/2026

Ever looked at a familiar word so long it stopped making sense? That's Jamais vu the strange opposite of déjà vu. Your brain momentarily forgets what it knows. Even the familiar can become foreign. 🧠


Student Presentation Session-06 | Psychology of learningSometimes the greatest skill we can master is how to acquire new...
07/08/2026

Student Presentation Session-06 | Psychology of learning

Sometimes the greatest skill we can master is how to acquire new knowledge. Unlocking this ability is the first step toward lifelong growth.
Join us for our 6th Student Presentation as we explore one of the most fascinating topics in psychology: "Psychology of Learning"

🗓️ Date: 08 August 2026
🕚 Time: 10:00 AM (BST)
💻 Google Meet:

We are delighted to introduce our presenters:

Maniha Arefin - Department of psychology University of Chittagong, Session 2025-26
Ucchal Aditiya Prokhor Bin Amir - Department of psychology, University of Chittagong, Session 2025-26
Jebunnesa Tasneem - Department of psychology, University of Chittagong, Session 2025-26

Together, they will explore the psychological mechanisms behind how we learn, strategies to improve memory retention, and practical study approaches for academic and personal success.

Be part of the conversation. Learn, reflect, and grow with us.
The Human Psyche 💙



Address

University Of Chittagong
Chittagong

Opening Hours

Monday 09:00 - 17:00
Tuesday 09:00 - 17:00
Wednesday 09:00 - 17:00
Thursday 09:00 - 17:00
Friday 09:00 - 17:00
Saturday 09:00 - 17:00
Sunday 09:00 - 17:00

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Human Psyche posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category