A Nation Divided

Says a guy wearing glasses presumably to correct his vision. What gives him the right to see clearly if he can’t do so naturally? Where would such a right even originate? A man who needs glasses to see clearly cannot do so without them, it doesn’t matter how he feels or what he wants. It cannot be, unless he has them corrected through treatment - which is also not a “natural” process.

In a world full of unplanned and unwanted pregnancies, you’re honestly attacking people who fight hard for what they would deem a privilege to raise a child? Strawman logic and a long winded way of saying you’re homophobic 🤷🏻‍♂️

Gotta catch ‘em all

Spot the American Idiot

Powerful response from Billie Joe of Green Day after Donald Trump accused him of "insulting Jesus":
“You know what insults Jesus? Deporting the stranger and separating babies from their mothers.
You want to know what insults Jesus? Kicking the sick off their health care while cutting taxes for billionaires.
You know what insults Jesus? Bombing innocent school children in Iran and sending our brave men and women off to die in another forever war… Covering up the Epstein files and then refusing to prosecute a single person in them.”

😭

The ramblings of a delusional psychopath throwing his toys out of the pram

Members of the British public are up in arms about Winston Churchill being removed from banknotes. They talk about the erosion of the UK’s culture, heritage and identity, yet seem blissfully unaware of what Churchill’s views were on these matters.

Churchill was actually an advocate for establishing what he called a “United States of Europe”. The European Union itself regards him as a “founding father”.

Addressing an audience in Zurich on 19th September 1946, Churchill heaped praise on the “noble continent”, regarding it as “the home of all the great parent races of the western world”. He also raised concerns over “frightful nationalistic quarrels” which had culminated in WWII - the likes of which he claimed he never wanted to see again and sought to prevent.

His solution?

To “re-create the European Family”, to unite it “in the sharing of its common inheritance”, to “build a kind of United States of Europe.” Churchill wanted a “European group which could give a sense of enlarged patriotism and common citizenship”, a partnership between France and Germany (whom he said must take the lead together) and to “make the material strength of a single state less important.” Does this sound like the sort of thing a contemporary Churchill fanboy would advocate?

He used the promise of happiness, freedom, prosperity and safety as a means of encouraging the people of Europe to embrace this notion and warned them to act urgently if they wanted to make this dream a reality. He proposed that the first step should be to form a Council of Europe (which eventually took place in 1949) and he insisted that any resistance to the project should be fought by assembling “those who will and those who can” - essentially to outmuscle any opposition and coax them into compliance.

The European Union of the present day bares an uncanny resemblance to Churchill’s vision of a “United States of Europe”, and had he been alive to see it, he would no doubt marvel at just how far the project has come, but also despair at the UK’s exclusion. The “frightful nationalistic quarrels” which he was concerned with also display a striking similarity to the very people who invoke his memory today.

Be angry about it if you want, but get your facts straight: Churchill wanted the UK to be annexed into European identity. In his own words, he wanted to the UK to be “less important”. If you’re angry about the erosion of British culture, perhaps take a look at the destruction of one of its greatest creations, the NHS, and channel your anger towards that.

Full text on Churchill’s 1946 Zurich speech: https://rm.coe.int/16806981f3

This is getting dangerously close to nuclear warfare

How to sound like an arrogant tosser having a hissy fit:

Choice of language is very telling

Just a friendly stroll, crossing a bridge is all

Nigel is a good lapdog isn’t he?

Farage has no values. He says whatever he thinks will advance his goal of being Britain’s Trump. He is NOT on your side.

As of March 2026, global crude oil prices are hovering around $70–$80 per barrel. Analysts warn that this could be driven to $100 a barrel by the Iran conflict and it’s not hard to see why.

Iran lies north of the Strait of Hormuz, a ~2 mile wide stretch of water that connects the Persian Gulf to the open ocean. Around 1/5 of the world’s oil supply moves through the corridor every day and almost all Gulf oil exports pass through it. Put simply, if this route is disrupted, energy prices are impacted instantly and economies feel it worldwide.

Several tanker owners have suspended oil shipments through the strait amid the ongoing conflict in the region. Shipping data also shows that hundreds of vessels, including oil and gas tankers, have dropped anchor in nearby waters, as traders brace for further disruption.

Prepare for price hikes.