Naholo Labour Solutions

Naholo Labour Solutions Labour Expert

05/10/2026
01/09/2026

THE EXPLOITATION OF CASUAL AND FIXED-TERM WORKERS IN NAMIBIA: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF LABOUR PRACTICES

Casual, temporary and fixed-term employment has become common in various sectors of the Namibian economy, including agriculture, construction, security, retail, hospitality, fishing and other industries.

There is nothing inherently unlawful about employing a person temporarily or for a fixed period where there is a genuine and justifiable reason for doing so. The concern arises when employers repeatedly use short-term contracts or label workers as “casuals” simply to avoid providing the rights, benefits and job security that ordinarily come with an employment relationship.

The Labour Act 11 of 2007 establishes minimum conditions of employment and protections for employees in Namibia. Employers should therefore understand that simply calling someone a “casual worker” does not automatically remove that worker from the protection of labour law.

LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND POSSIBLE ABUSES
1. Repeated Fixed-Term Contracts and the Presumption of Indefinite Employment

One of the most important protections is contained in section 128C of the Labour Act.

The law provides that an employee is presumed to be employed indefinitely unless the employer can establish a justification for employing that employee on a fixed-term basis. This provision does not apply to managerial employees.

This is particularly important where an employee is employed continuously to perform work that is permanent and ongoing in nature, but the employer repeatedly renews short-term contracts.

For example, an employee may work for the same company for several years while receiving three-month, six-month or twelve-month contracts one after another.

Employers should not assume that repeatedly issuing fixed-term contracts automatically prevents an employee from acquiring protection associated with indefinite employment. The employer may be required to demonstrate a genuine justification for the fixed-term arrangement.

2. Wages and Unlawful Deductions

Casual and fixed-term employees are still employees and are entitled to applicable minimum employment protections.

Employers cannot simply pay workers whatever amount they choose because they describe them as “casual”.

Where a statutory minimum wage, wage order or applicable collective agreement determines minimum remuneration, the employer must comply with it.

Similarly, deductions from an employee's remuneration must comply with the Labour Act and other applicable laws.

Temporary employment should never become a mechanism for cheap labour or for avoiding statutory wage obligations.

3. Leave Entitlements

Another misconception is that casual or fixed-term employees automatically have no leave rights.

Under section 23 of the Labour Act, employees are entitled to annual leave. The Act generally provides for at least four consecutive weeks of annual leave with full remuneration during an annual leave cycle, calculated according to the employee's ordinary working week.

Section 24 further provides for sick leave, subject to the requirements contained in the Act.

Therefore, where an individual genuinely qualifies as an employee, an employer should not simply deny statutory leave benefits merely because the employer has labelled the worker “casual”, “temporary” or “contract”.

4. Pregnancy and Maternity Protection

Female employees are also protected.

Under section 26 of the Labour Act, a female employee who has completed at least six months of continuous service is entitled to maternity leave as provided by the Act.

The law further protects employees against dismissal during maternity leave or on grounds arising from pregnancy, delivery, family status or related responsibilities, subject to the provisions of the Act.

Employers should therefore be extremely careful about terminating or refusing to renew employment merely because an employee becomes pregnant.

Pregnancy must never be treated as an excuse to dispose of a worker.

5. Termination and Job Security

Casual or temporary status does not automatically mean that an employer may simply tell an employee, “Do not come back tomorrow.”

Section 30 of the Labour Act provides minimum notice periods where a contract may be terminated on notice. Depending on the length of employment, the minimum notice can range from one day to one month.

An employer may, in appropriate circumstances, make payment instead of notice as provided under section 31.

Most importantly, compliance with notice requirements does not automatically make a dismissal fair.

The Labour Act protects employees against unfair dismissal. An employee who believes that he or she has been unfairly dismissed may challenge that dismissal through the labour dispute-resolution mechanisms provided by law.

6. Severance Pay

Employees should also understand that severance pay is not automatically payable whenever employment ends.

Whether severance pay is payable depends on the circumstances of termination and whether the statutory requirements have been met.

Employers should therefore not use the word “casual” as a blanket justification for refusing benefits that an employee may legally be entitled to receive.

7. Labour-Hire and Recruitment Agency Workers

Namibia's Labour Act also provides important protection for workers placed through private employment agencies.

Under section 128, an individual, other than an independent contractor, who is placed by a private employment agency with a user enterprise is regarded, for purposes of the Labour Act and other laws, as an employee of the user enterprise.

Such workers have the same rights under the Labour Act as other employees, including rights relating to trade-union membership and representation.

This is important because employers should not use labour brokers or employment agencies merely as a mechanism to avoid their responsibilities towards employees.

IMPACT ON NAMIBIAN WORKERS

The continuous misuse of casual and fixed-term employment can have serious consequences.

A worker may spend five or ten years working for the same employer but still live from contract to contract, never knowing whether employment will continue the following month.

Such insecurity makes it difficult for workers to plan their lives, support their families, obtain financing, secure accommodation or make long-term financial commitments.

It can also create an unhealthy imbalance of power in the workplace, because employees may be afraid to raise legitimate complaints about wages, working conditions or unfair treatment for fear that their contracts will simply not be renewed.

Employment flexibility should not become permanent insecurity.

WHAT SHOULD BE DONE?

Namibia should continue strengthening enforcement of existing labour protections, particularly in sectors where casual and temporary employment is widespread.

Employers should be required to justify the use of fixed-term employment where the Labour Act requires such justification.

Labour inspections should pay particular attention to employees who have worked continuously for the same employer for long periods while repeatedly receiving short-term contracts.

Workers should also be educated about their rights concerning wages, leave, maternity protection, notice, dismissal, Social Security registration and other basic conditions of employment.

Trade unions, employers, labour inspectors, the Labour Commissioner, the Social Security Commission and other stakeholders all have an important role to play in ensuring compliance.

CONCLUSION

There is nothing wrong with genuine temporary employment where the nature of the work justifies it.

The problem begins when “casual”, “temporary” or “fixed-term” employment becomes a deliberate strategy to keep employees permanently insecure and to avoid obligations imposed by Namibian labour law.

The Labour Act 11 of 2007 exists to establish minimum employment standards and promote fair labour practices.

A worker should not perform permanent work for years while permanently being treated as temporary.

Casual employment must not become permanent exploitation.

Know your rights.
Know your obligations.
Promote fair labour practices in Namibia.

20/08/2026

Respect Should Never Depend on Someone's Job Title.

It's easy to be polite to senior leaders. The real test of character is how you treat your peers, support staff, and junior colleagues when there's nothing to gain.

If you're respectful only when someone has authority, that's not professionalism, it's positioning.
Workplaces change. People get promoted. Teams are reshuffled. The colleague you overlooked today could be the leader you report to tomorrow, or the person whose support you genuinely need.

But even beyond career progression, every person deserves to be treated with dignity and respect. Titles may change, but character is remembered.
The most respected professionals don't adjust their kindness based on someone's position. They treat everyone with the same courtesy, humility, and professionalism.

My advice? Let your respect be consistent, not conditional. It's one of the strongest qualities you can bring to any workplace.

Do you think respect in the workplace is earned, given, or both?

15/08/2026

CAN AN EMPLOYER TERMINATE EMPLOYMENT VIA WHATSAPP?

Yes, an employer may communicate a termination of employment through WhatsApp, but the use of WhatsApp does not, by itself, make the termination lawful.

In the Namibian labour context, the important question is not simply how the termination was communicated, but whether the employer complied with the Labour Act, 2007, the employee’s contract of employment, and the principles of fair termination.

For example, if an employee receives a WhatsApp message stating:

“Don’t come to work tomorrow. Your employment is terminated.”

that message may constitute evidence that the employer intended to terminate the employment relationship. However, the employer cannot rely on the fact that the message was sent electronically to escape its legal obligations.

What must be considered?

🔹 Was there a valid reason for the termination?
Under Namibian labour law, an employer generally needs a valid and fair reason for terminating employment, depending on the circumstances.

🔹 Was a fair procedure followed?
Where the termination relates to misconduct, poor performance or incapacity, the employer may be required to follow an appropriate disciplinary or other fair procedure before termination.

🔹 What does the employment contract say?
The contract may contain provisions dealing with notice, termination and other conditions of employment. These must be considered together with the applicable provisions of the Labour Act.

🔹 Was notice given or was payment in lieu of notice made?
Where notice is legally required, an employer generally cannot simply disregard the notice requirements because the termination was communicated through WhatsApp.

🔹 Was the employee given an opportunity to respond where required?
The absence of a warning or disciplinary hearing does not automatically make every termination unlawful. However, where the circumstances require a fair process, simply sending a WhatsApp message and ending the employment may expose the employer to a dispute.

WhatsApp can become important evidence

Employees should not delete the message.

Keep:

The WhatsApp termination message;
The employment contract;
Payslips;
Previous warnings or disciplinary correspondence;
Emails and other communications with the employer;
Any evidence relating to the reason for the termination; and
Records showing when the employee was instructed not to report for duty.

These documents may become important if the employee challenges the termination through the appropriate Namibian labour dispute-resolution process.

The bottom line

A WhatsApp message can communicate a termination, but WhatsApp does not give an employer immunity from Namibian labour law.

The real question is:

Was the termination substantively and procedurally fair, and did the employer comply with the applicable legal and contractual requirements?

So, if an employer simply sends “Don’t come to work tomorrow”, the employee should not assume that the matter ends there. The message itself may actually become important evidence in determining whether the termination was lawful and fair.

14/08/2026

🇳🇦 CAN AN EMPLOYEE IN NAMIBIA BE CHEATED JUST BECAUSE THEY CANNOT READ?

Imagine an elderly farm worker, domestic worker, cleaner, security guard or general worker who cannot read English.

An employer puts a lengthy document in front of the employee and says:

“Just put your thumbprint or an ‘X’ here. It is only a formality.”

The employee believes they are signing an employment document, acknowledgement of wages, or perhaps a disciplinary record.

But the document actually contains a resignation, settlement agreement, admission of wrongdoing, or waiver of important employment rights.

Can an employer simply take advantage of the employee because they cannot read?

🇳🇦 NO.

Namibian labour law does not give an employer a free pass to obtain an employee's signature or thumbprint on a document the employee does not understand.

⚖️ WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN?

If an employee cannot read or does not understand the language of a workplace document, the employer should take reasonable steps to ensure that the employee understands what they are being asked to sign.

This is particularly important where the document concerns:

🔹 A disciplinary hearing or warning
🔹 A resignation
🔹 A termination of employment
🔹 A settlement agreement
🔹 A retrenchment or voluntary separation agreement
🔹 An admission of misconduct
🔹 A deduction or financial obligation
🔹 A waiver or settlement of labour-related claims

Simply saying “you signed it” should not end the enquiry where there is a genuine dispute about whether the employee understood what they were signing.

🗣️ LANGUAGE MATTERS

If an employee cannot understand English, the contents should be explained to them in a language they understand.

The employee should be given a genuine opportunity to:

✅ Ask questions
✅ Understand the consequences
✅ Seek advice or representation where appropriate
✅ Read or have the document read and explained to them
✅ Obtain a copy of what they signed

And never pressure an employee to sign a blank document or sign immediately without understanding it.

🚨 A SIGNATURE IS NOT A LICENCE TO EXPLOIT

Employers have legitimate rights to require employees to sign lawful workplace documents.

But those rights should never be used to exploit an employee's lack of literacy or understanding.

Likewise, employees should not be encouraged to sign documents they do not understand simply because they are afraid of losing their jobs.

If there is a dispute about what an employee signed, the circumstances surrounding the signing can become very important.

What was explained? Who explained it? In which language? Was the employee given an opportunity to understand and ask questions? Was the employee pressured? What exactly did the document say?

These questions can matter enormously in a labour dispute.

🇳🇦 KNOW YOUR RIGHTS. KNOW WHAT YOU ARE SIGNING.

A thumbprint may identify a person as the person who marked the document—but it does not make exploitation acceptable.

Educating. Enlightening. Empowering.

✍️⚖️
13/08/2026

✍️⚖️

Address

Otavi, Walvis, North
Windhoek
900

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Naholo Labour Solutions posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share