07/18/2026
In today's unsurprising news, the City of Henderson quietly advertised for a new Finance Director.
I can't blame Joey Fuqua for walking away. He spent weeks defending his budget to the City Council, only to watch that same Council aggressively pursue cuts to his own department. Whatever the stated rationale, the message to a finance professional could not have been clearer — and when the message is that clear, the exit is easy.
What is going on with the governance in the City of Henderson?
Look at the record under Mayor Elliott and her four reliable votes: four city managers. Three city attorneys. No city engineer. And now a departing Finance Director — at the very moment the City's own budget presentation warns of "very possible difficulty in balancing" the FY28 budget. Add the controversy surrounding the termination of the assistant to the mayor, and a pattern emerges that is difficult to read as anything other than governance by grievance. Whether every departure has the same cause, the cumulative effect is the same: the City's financial operations are being hollowed out at exactly the moment they can least afford it.
Consider what the next Finance Director inherits. A fund balance at 25% against the City's own 30% minimum goal. A $5 million fund balance draw to balance this year's budget. A $50M+ operation spanning four funds and a regional water system. And a Council that just demonstrated, publicly, how it treats the person holding the ledger.
The City is advertising the position at $90,000–$110,000 — a range that wouldn't be competitive for this job in a stable organization, let alone this one. Qualified finance officers talk to each other, and Henderson's reputation now precedes it. It is going to be very difficult to find someone willing to step into this mess — and if Council doesn't change how it treats the professionals who keep this city solvent, no salary range will fix that.
We need to demand accountability from our elected officials.