11/26/2025
Sleepy Hollow Planning Commission 11/25 Meeting Update! Here’s just about everything you need to know.
Here’s :
1. The Kdka news article
2. Our analysis of what actually happened and what it means.
3. An executive summary of the issues and points I made at the meeting last night in my public comments regarding the inefficiency and key missing items in the Sleepy Hollow final plan as submitted for review by the developer.
1. From KDKA:
South Park Township planning commission votes against controversial Sleepy Hollow housing development
By Mike Darnay
November 26, 2025 / 1:02 AM EST / CBS Pittsburgh
Controversial plans for a housing development in South Park Township have been voted down -- at least for now.
The township's planning commission voted 5 to 1 against recommending the proposed Majestic Woods development to the board of supervisors.
Tuesday night's standing-room only meeting lasted several hours with the project's developer taking questions from the board about what has transpired in the planning process since preliminary approval was granted last year.
"Since that time, we've been kind of working through discussions with the conservation district, working with our engineers in regard to final plans, and discussions in regard to submittals that we've done with South Park." said Mike Wetzel of Victor-Wetzel Associates, who was speaking on behalf of the developer.
South Park's planning commission has voted to not recommend the controversial Majestic Woods housing development project to the township's board of supervisors.
The proposed development calls for 108 single-family homes along Sleepy Hollow Road, right near the South Park Game Preserve.
South Park resident Tim Foster spoke during a public comment period of Tuesday night's meeting, addressing issues including the status of the developer's preliminary approval, the developers' plans not meeting compliance review requirements, and outstanding contingencies from the preliminary approval.
"All four of these issues lead to one unavoidable conclusion," Foster said. "This application cannot legally move forward tonight."
South Park's Sleepy Hollow is known for its 60 acres that are mostly wooded and used for walking, hiking and housing bison.
People who live in the area raised concerns about the impact on the bison that live there.
Neighbors have had problems with the idea for more than two years, going back to when a different developer walked away from a separate proposal on the same land.
Last spring, the board of supervisors gave preliminary approval to a controversial housing
development, voting against the recommendation of their own planning commission. At the time, township supervisors attached a number of requirements for the developer before the project could move forward.
The board of supervisors are now set to meet and discuss the project at their next meeting at 7 p.m. on December 8.
2. Our analysis of the Planning Commission Meeting on 11/25/25
What Last Night’s Planning Commission Vote Really Means
A lot of people have been asking what actually happened at the Planning Commission meeting, so here’s a clear breakdown.
The Planning Commission essentially has two questions they must answer before giving any advice to the Board of Supervisors:
🔹 Question 1:
Is the final plan for the proposed Sleepy Hollow development complete as filed?
Meaning — does it meet all the requirements in South Park Township’s Land Development Ordinances (SALDO)?
If the answer is NO, the process stops right there.
The plan is tabled and brought back at a future meeting after the developer fixes the missing items.
🔹 Question 2:
The Commission only gets to this question if the answer to Question 1 is YES — meaning the plan is fully complete and meets every required ordinance.
If — and only if — the plan is complete, the Planning Commission then votes on whether to:
• Recommend the development to the Board of Supervisors, or
• Not recommend it.
Why last night’s vote is so troubling
In our opinion, and based on the evidence and documentation presented, the final plan is not complete.
Not even close.
There are major required items missing, deferred, or unfinished under SALDO.
So the proper vote on Question 1 should have been:
👉 NO — the plan is not complete.
That would have pushed the issue to the next Planning Commission meeting, giving time for the developer to meet the legal requirements.
Instead… an executive session changed everything
After a nearly 30-minute closed-door executive session — which many of us found questionable — the township solicitor, Irving Firman, advised the Commission that their hands were essentially tied.
We were told that if the township’s own hired professionals —
• Carolyn Yagle (Planning Consultant, Environmental Planning & Design), and
• Dan Deiseroth (Township Engineer, Gateway Engineers)
state that the plan is “complete,” then the Commission must accept that, regardless of the public evidence showing dozens of deficiencies.
If that’s truly the rule, then what was the point of nearly four hours of public testimony?
Why allow residents to speak at all if the outcome is predetermined?
What it looks like — in plain terms
In our opinion, it’s clear the plan was being pushed through no matter what was presented.
And it appears very likely the goal is to get final approval from the Board of Supervisors in December — the last meeting before the newly elected Board, chosen by residents demanding transparency and integrity, is sworn in this January.
What’s next
This isn’t over.
We fully believe the fight will continue — legally, procedurally, and publicly — until every remedy is exhausted and every requirement is enforced.
Stay tuned.
Stay engaged.
Our community deserves better.
3. Executive Summary of the Issues that I addressed during the meeting.
SLEEPY HOLLOW DEVELOPMENT — COMMUNITY ALERT
Why the Planning Commission Cannot Legally Approve This Final Plan
South Park residents, here’s what you need to know —
After months of reviewing documents, ordinances, communications, and legal precedent, it is clear that the Sleepy Hollow final application is NOT legally eligible for approval.
Here’s why:
1️⃣ Preliminary Approval Automatically Expired — Developer Never Met the 30-Day Requirement
Township Code 118-13(E) requires the developer to accept the conditions in writing within 30 days of preliminary approval.
That never happened.
There was no communication for a full year, and no acceptance letter exists.
➡️ By law, preliminary approval was automatically rescinded.
➡️ No preliminary approval = no valid final application.
2️⃣ Mandatory Final Review Step Never Happened
Township Code 118-16 requires all final plans to be sent to the Allegheny County Conservation District (ACCD) for review.
On 11/21/25, the ACCD confirmed in writing:
• They never received the developer’s final plan.
• They never conducted the required 30-day review.
➡️ Without this step, the application is not complete and cannot legally move forward.
3️⃣ More Than 50 Required Final Items Are Missing
Township Code 118-15 lists what MUST be included in a final submission:
• construction plans
• certificates
• notifications
• reports
• development details
Gateway’s 11/21/25 letter confirms it:
➡️ The final application is NOT complete under SALDO.
4️⃣ Pennsylvania Case Law: A Final Plan Cannot Be Approved With Unmet Preliminary Conditions
The Board of Supervisors attached 9 contingencies to preliminary approval — including:
“The developer must obtain an NPDES permit.”
Not “apply.”
Not “intend.”
Obtain.
The developer still has not done this.
In Lyons Borough v. Maxatawny Township (2015), the Commonwealth Court ruled:
➡️ Final approval is illegal if preliminary conditions remain unmet.
➡️ Approving a final plan anyway is “premature and improper.”
This is binding case law in Pennsylvania.
BOTTOM LINE: THIS PLAN CANNOT LEGALLY BE APPROVED.
• Preliminary approval expired.
• Required agency review is missing.
• Over 50 final items are incomplete.
• Mandatory preliminary conditions are unmet.
• Commonwealth Court precedent forbids approval.
Once again, we have multiple conclusive reasons why this matter is premature, incomplete, and not eligible for consideration by the Planning Commission.
Under both Township ordinances and Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court precedent, the Planning Commission must find that this final application is not proper, not complete, and cannot legally advance.
Thank you.
- Timothy Foster