21/10/2026
๐๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ง ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ญ๐: ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐, ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ค๐ข๐ง๐
๐ต๐ฆ ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐ง๐ / ๐บ๐ผ๐ถ๐ฝ
The pen is mightier, but is it freer?
Across the world, writers are discovering how costly their words can become. This month, two authors, separated by continents but connected by questions of freedom, found themselves confronting the consequences of expression.
In the United Kingdom, Irish novelist Sally Rooneyโs publisher, Faber, announced it would cease supplying her books to British retailers. UK counterterrorism legislation prevented the publisher from transferring royalties to Rooney following her declared intention to support for Palestine Action, a proscribed organisation. Although her novels have not been formally banned, the case raises questions about the consequences of restrictions on political expression.
Meanwhile in Indonesia, author Feby Indirani faces a police investigation over alleged blasphemy in her short-story collection Memburu Muhammad. Following threats against a literary event, its cancellation and gendered online harassment, Human Rights Watch criticised authorities for investigating her fiction as opposed to the intimidation directed at her.
These cases reflect a wider concern. According to PEN America, 11,982 instances of book bans were recorded in US public schools during the 2026 academic year.
Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) protects freedom of expression, including artistic and political speech. Restrictions must be prescribed by law, pursue a legitimate aim, and satisfy requirements of necessity and proportionality. In Britain, Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides further protection.
๐๐๐ง๐๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ (๐๐๐๐) calls upon governments to uphold these international obligations, protect writers from intimidation and ensure restrictions on expression are never used to suppress legitimate dissent.
Freedom of expression goes beyond merely protecting words we agree with. Its significance lies in protecting disagreement, criticism and uncomfortable ideas. Censorship is dangerous, because the moment a society begins deciding which voices are too dangerous to hear, it risks forgetting why freedom of expression mattered in the first place.
------------------------------------------------