20/06/2026
REGISTRAR-GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT ENGAGES STAKEHOLDERS ON THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF KENTE GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION
The Ghana Industrial Property Office (GHIPO) under the Registrar-General's Department (RGD) convened a stakeholder workshop on the International Registration of the Kente Geographical Indication (GI) on Wednesday, 17th June 2026, in Accra. The workshop brought together representatives of Kente weaving communities and staff of GHIPO to discuss pathways for securing international protection for Kente.
The Registrar-General, Mrs. Grace Ama Issahaque, in her opening remarks, underscored the importance of the workshop in advancing Ghana's efforts to secure international protection for Kente, following its successful protection at the national level. Mrs. Issahaque noted that while Ghana has established a legal framework for GIs, different countries adopt varying approach for protecting such products. The Registrar-General shared light on how some GIs are protected under trademark law in some jurisdictions, such as the United States, while other countries maintain stand-alone sui generis GI systems.
The Registrar-General emphasised the need to develop strategies that would enable Ghana to effectively pursue protection for Kente through the most appropriate legal mechanisms in target markets. Mrs. Issahaque further encouraged participants to engage actively in the deliberations and contribute their perspectives to ensure that stakeholder concerns are adequately reflected in the proposed strategies. She expressed confidence that the workshop would contribute significantly to Ghana's efforts to secure stronger international recognition and protection for its culturally significant Kente product.
The Head of the GI and Plant Variety Protection Units at RGD, Dr. Courage Besah-Adanu, during his presentation, provided participants with an overview of GIs and their role in protecting products whose qualities, characteristics and reputation are linked to specific geographical origins.
He explained that countries are increasingly leveraging GI protection to preserve cultural heritage, strengthen product identity, and create economic opportunities for local producers. He also noted that GI protection helps formalise and reinforce the reputation that products have already established among consumers while safeguarding their names and distinctive characteristics from misuse and imitation.
Using the example of Ch*****ne from France, Dr. Besah-Adanu illustrated how GIs have been successfully used to protect products and enhanced their value in international markets. He further highlighted several Ghanaian products with strong potential for GI protection, including Smock, Pona Yam, Waakye, Jollof, Y)) ke Gari (Gobe), Ekumfi Pineapple, Anloga Shallots, Shea Butter, Bolga baskets and hats, Dzomi palm oil and Akpeteshie (apio).
He stressed that successful GI protection extends beyond legal registration and requires the establishment of strong systems for standardisation, traceability, quality assurance, and producer organisation. These systems, he explained, are essential for maintaining product authenticity and reputation while ensuring that consumers can confidently identify genuine products.
In addition, he noted that ongoing efforts to secure international protection for Kente were complimented by existing cultural preservation initiatives, including UNESCO's recognition of Kente as an intangible cultural asset of Ghana, which have also reinforce the significance of Kente and its uniqueness as Ghana's cultural heritage. He emphasised that international protection would provide an additional layer of recognition while creating new economic opportunities for producers and communities associated with the particular products.
The presentation further highlighted the distinctions between the Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) systems. He explained that products qualifying under the PDO scheme must have their raw materials sourced, production, processing, and packaging carried out entirely within a designated geographical area, while the PGI framework provides greater flexibility by recognising products for which at least one significant stage of production occurs within the area of origin