11/06/2026
The ₹370 Biryani controversy is not really about biryani.
It's about entitlement.
A young man spent ₹370 on a meal and publicly suggested that he deserved something in return.
What followed was outrage, criticism, apologies, and eventually the loss of his job.
But let's pause for a moment.
How many times have we heard versions of this thinking in everyday life?
👉 "I spent money on you."
👉 "I did so much for you."
👉 "I invested my time."
👉 "At least I deserve something."
No.
Respect, kindness, gifts, dinners, support, and affection should never be treated as transactions.
Nobody can buy consent.
Nobody can earn entitlement to another person.
Nobody owes intimacy because money was spent.
That part is simple.
But another question is equally interesting.
Would this person's employer have reacted the same way if the video had not gone viral?
If social media had ignored it...
If there was no outrage...
If nobody was tagging the company...
Would the consequences have been the same?
Or are we increasingly living in a world where public visibility determines accountability?
I don't have all the answers.
But I believe both questions deserve discussion.
1️⃣ Why do so many people still confuse spending money with entitlement?
2️⃣ Should social media outrage influence employment decisions?
Share your views respectfully.