16/10/2026
The EFCC cannot be dictated to on when or how to conduct its investigations. However, the question many Nigerians are asking is this: Why does there appear to be selective justice?
Why is the EFCC reopening the case involving former Vice President Atiku Abubakar at this particular time? Some Nigerians may suspect that the renewed investigation is connected to his recent vocal criticism of the incumbent administration. While that suspicion requires evidence, the timing raises questions that deserve clear answers.
But let me ask another important question: What about other politicians, particularly those within the ruling APC, who have faced allegations of corruption? Why are Nigerians not seeing the same level of urgency in investigating other high-profile cases involving alleged misappropriation or looting of public funds?
The EFCC must understand that public trust cannot be built on selective enforcement. If the commission wants Nigerians to believe in its commitment to fighting corruption, it must demonstrate impartiality, professionalism, and fairness in every investigation, regardless of the political affiliation or status of the individuals involved.
The fight against corruption must not be used as a political weapon. It must be a genuine fight for justice.
If the EFCC can reopen one politician's case, Nigerians have every right to ask what has happened to other outstanding corruption cases. The commission should provide clear explanations, demonstrate consistency, and ensure that nobody is above the law and nobody is unfairly targeted because of political differences.
Ultimately, the issue is not whether the EFCC should investigate Atiku Abubakar or any other politician. If there is credible evidence of wrongdoing, the law should take its course.
The real issue is whether the same standards of investigation and accountability apply to everyone, regardless of party affiliation.
