United Labour Party Of South Sudan

For more information please visit our website at below links

Nimule TV
The Following

Silver X
Lokuowe Gordon
LAKES MEDIA

United Labour Party of South Sudan (ULPOSS) - For God And Our Nation For God And Our Nation

Easter messages from Ernest Ogwaro the leader of ULPOSS

This Easter, I reflected on the moment when Jesus Christ endured agony on the cross at Calvary and said, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.” In that moment, He showed us that He truly practiced what He preached—teaching us the power of love and forgiveness.

I have come to understand that forgiveness is a great gift. It brings healing not only to those who are forgiven, but also to those who choose to forgive. God blesses both.

The Bible calls us to forgive those who have wronged us, even those who have hurt or persecuted us in painful and unjust ways.

My message this Easter goes to the citizens and leaders of South Sudan: may this season mark a new beginning for our nation. May we embrace forgiveness, reconcile with one another, and pray for those who have caused us pain.

To our leaders—you are the pillars of this nation—may you carry the spirit of forgiveness into your decisions. Consider releasing political detainees, those under house arrest, and those facing ongoing trials, so that our nation may move toward true peace, unity, and stability.

May this Easter message touch our hearts and guide us toward a brighter future.

Lokuowe Gordon
Kevina TV show on Builiding Junub Sudan
Nimule TV

🌙 EID MUBARAK 🌙

On this blessed occasion, I take a moment to reflect on the true meaning of Eid and the challenges faced by many communities around the world.

May this Eid bring peace, understanding, and hope to all.
May Allah ease hardships and unite hearts across nations.

✨ Wishing everyone a peaceful and blessed Eid ✨

LAKES MEDIA
Africa Youth Leadership Forum
The Following

Fellow citizen read below statement .

South Sudan is a country endowed with abundant resources and great potential to benefit all its citizens. However, progress has been limited by the absence of a strong sense of nationalism and collective responsibility. The actions of a few individuals, driven by personal interests, have contributed to division and slowed national development.
This is not about assigning blame to any particular community. The leadership has had ample time to address challenges and correct past mistakes. At the same time, the continued presence of armed political actors undermines institutions and weakens public trust in governance.
Had reforms been pursued consistently through peaceful and lawful means, the country might have advanced further. Instead, substantial national resources are directed toward security and military expenditures, including support for foreign forces, rather than essential services and development.
For lasting peace and stability, all South Sudanese who care deeply about this nation should commit to non‑violence and constructive political engagement. The government, in turn, must uphold the rule of law, avoid unlawful detentions, respect political diversity, and ensure timely and credible elections. These steps are essential for national unity and sustainable progress.

The Following
Africa Youth Leadership Forum
Lokuowe Gordon
LAKES MEDIA
Ernest Ogwaro

A Human Rights–Based Response to Calls for Military Entry into Akobo
By Ernest Ogwaro

The recent opinion article by Ezekiel Lol Gatkuoth, calling on the people of Akobo to raise white flags in anticipation of the entry of the South Sudan People’s Defence Forces (SSPDF), raises serious concerns that deserve careful reflection. While the desire for peace and stability in South Sudan is shared by all citizens, any approach to restoring order must prioritise the protection of human rights, civilian safety, and genuine reconciliation among communities.

Protection of Civilians Must Come First

International human rights and humanitarian principles emphasise that civilians must never be placed in situations where they may be perceived as participants in a conflict. Encouraging residents to raise white flags in anticipation of a military operation risks exposing them to danger and blurring the line between civilians and armed actors.

The people of Akobo—like all communities across South Sudan—have the fundamental right to life, security, and dignity. These rights are not conditional upon demonstrating loyalty to any military force or political authority. Civilian populations should remain protected, neutral, and free from pressure to publicly signal support for any armed group.

Military Presence Does Not Automatically Create Peace

The history of conflict in South Sudan has shown that the deployment of armed forces alone cannot guarantee sustainable peace. While security forces such as the South Sudan People’s Defence Forces have a legitimate role in protecting national stability, peace built primarily on military presence often fails to address the underlying grievances that fuel conflict.

Lasting stability requires political dialogue, accountability, and meaningful engagement with local communities. Without these elements, military deployments risk escalating tensions rather than resolving them.

The Importance of Dialogue and Inclusive Peace

The conflict dynamics in many parts of the country involve complex relationships between government forces, opposition movements such as the Sudan People’s Liberation Army-In Opposition (SPLA-IO), and community-based armed groups. Addressing these challenges requires inclusive peace processes that allow all stakeholders to be heard.

Encouraging dialogue between national leaders, local authorities, civil society organisations, and community elders is essential. Genuine reconciliation must be built on trust, transparency, and respect for human rights rather than symbolic displays of submission or allegiance.

Safeguarding Community Unity

Communities such as the Lou Nuer have historically valued solidarity, resilience, and the preservation of life. These values should guide national discussions about security and peacebuilding. Public narratives that frame certain groups as obstacles to peace can deepen mistrust and create further divisions.

Instead, leaders and commentators should promote unity among communities and avoid rhetoric that risks portraying civilians as supporters of one side or another.

Responsibility of Leaders and Commentators

Public voices carry significant influence during times of tension. Writers, political leaders, and community representatives therefore have a responsibility to advocate for approaches that protect life, uphold human rights, and prevent further suffering.

Calls that appear to encourage civilian participation in military operations—even symbolically—can unintentionally increase risks for vulnerable populations.

A Path Toward Sustainable Peace

The future of South Sudan must be built on principles that place human dignity at the centre of national policy. Protecting civilians, strengthening the rule of law, supporting humanitarian access, and advancing inclusive political dialogue are essential steps toward lasting peace.

Rather than urging communities to signal submission to armed forces, national discourse should focus on building trust between citizens and institutions, addressing the root causes of conflict, and supporting reconciliation among all South Sudanese.

Peace cannot be imposed through symbols or military movement alone. It must be constructed through justice, respect for human rights, and a shared commitment to the protection of every life.

Only through these principles can South Sudan move toward a future defined not by fear and division, but by unity, stability, and dignity for all its people.

Shoutout to our new followers. Thank you for joining our community and engaging with our work. Your support strengthens our shared commitment to public participation and collective progress.

With the Africa Youth Leadership Forum, I just got recognised as one of their top fans! 🎉

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Date: 15 January 2026
Location: Juba , South Sudan
Distribution: International Media | Regional Media | Civil Society Networks

Internet Shutdowns in the Horn of Africa Signal Fear, Not Stability

Across parts of East Africa and the Horn of Africa, internet shutdowns have become an increasingly common response by authorities facing political pressure and public dissent. Often presented as necessary security measures, these blackouts function in practice to restrict civic space, disrupt mobilisation, and limit the flow of information beyond national borders.

In a region where digital connectivity supports mobile banking, remittances, humanitarian coordination, education, and independent media, internet shutdowns carry immediate and far-reaching consequences. They disrupt livelihoods, slow economic activity, and deepen public frustration—particularly among youth and urban populations.

While communication blackouts may temporarily reduce visibility, they do not resolve underlying political grievances. Citizens adapt through alternative channels, cross-border networks, and diaspora communication. When connectivity is restored, information re-emerges rapidly, often accompanied by heightened public anger and increased international scrutiny.

More significantly, repeated internet shutdowns point to a deeper crisis of legitimacy. Governments confident in public trust do not need to disconnect their populations from regional and global discourse. Reliance on digital blackouts reflects institutional insecurity rather than stability.

The central question is no longer whether internet access will return, but how much economic damage and political credibility will be lost before it does. Prolonged digital isolation is unsustainable in an interconnected region.

In the Horn of Africa, restricting access to information does not secure authority—it accelerates its erosion.

Issued by:
Ernest Ogwaro
Political Analyst

Media Enquiries:
Available upon request

PRESS STATEMENT

Response to the SSOA Statement and Its Questionable Claims of Legitimacy

Juba, January 2026

We have taken note of the recent press statement issued by the faction claiming leadership of the South Sudan Opposition Alliance (SSOA) under Hussein Abdelbagi Akol. While the statement attempts to present itself as a defence of institutional order, it raises serious concerns about political intent, democratic practice, and the genuine pursuit of national unity.

1. Disownment Does Not Equal Democratic Legitimacy

The decision to “disown” a faction within SSOA is presented as lawful and necessary. However, the statement fails to demonstrate how this decision was reached through inclusive, democratic, and consultative processes involving all member parties of the Alliance.

Political unity cannot be achieved through unilateral declarations or selective interpretations of internal rules. Democracy within a political alliance requires dialogue, consultation, and consensus—not exclusion and political purges.

A decision that deepens division within the opposition cannot credibly be described as promoting unity.

2. Selective Use of the Charter Undermines Institutional Credibility

While the statement repeatedly invokes the SSOA Charter, it applies it selectively to justify the concentration of power rather than to strengthen institutions.

If respect for the Charter were the true objective, then:
• Why were inclusive leadership conferences not convened?
• Why were internal mechanisms for dispute resolution not exhausted?
• Why were differences escalated to the media instead of resolved politically?

Using the Charter as a political weapon, rather than as a guide for collective governance, undermines its legitimacy and weakens the Alliance.

3. Power Struggle Disguised as Institutional Reform

Despite claims of defending institutional integrity, the tone and substance of the statement suggest otherwise. The persistent focus on titles, authority, and recognition reveals a deeper issue: a struggle for power and positioning, not a struggle for democratic reform.

At a time when South Sudanese citizens demand:
• Peace,
• Economic recovery,
• Security,
• Credible democratic transition,

the leadership of SSOA should be articulating clear political objectives and policy alternatives, not engaging in internal power contests aimed at securing seats in government.

4. Absence of a Clear Political Vision

Notably absent from the statement is any meaningful discussion of:
• Electoral reforms,
• Governance priorities,
• Economic recovery,
• National reconciliation,
• The suffering of ordinary citizens.

This absence raises a critical question:
Is the current leadership driven by a national political agenda, or merely by competition for positions within the transitional government?

Political alliances exist to serve the people—not to recycle elites through power arrangements.

5. Unity and Democracy Cannot Be Enforced

True unity is built through inclusion, compromise, and shared purpose. Democracy thrives where dissent is managed through dialogue, not silenced through disownment.

Any leadership that claims commitment to democracy must demonstrate it internally before preaching it nationally.

Conclusion

The recent SSOA statement does not convincingly demonstrate a commitment to political unity or democratic values. Instead, it reflects an internal power struggle that risks weakening the opposition and distracting from the urgent national challenges facing South Sudan.

The people of South Sudan deserve opposition politics rooted in vision, accountability, and unity of purpose—not factional battles for power and positions.

Only an inclusive, democratic, and principled approach can restore confidence in the opposition and contribute meaningfully to a peaceful and democratic future for the country.

Africa Youth Leadership Forum
Nimule TV
LAKES MEDIA