10/15/2026
We are a few short days away from the start of early voting, and just 19 days until election day. While I cannot endorse a specific candidate and no longer carry a party affiliation to support a specific party candidate, there is nothing that prevents me from providing my insight or thoughts to help you make an informed decision in electing your next Justice of the Peace for Precinct 2. Keep in mind as you read this that the two candidates you have to choose from are both attorneys, so regardless of who you vote for, there is no choice for what I call a “peer judge;” Your next Justice of the Peace will be a lawyer. Some welcome that reality, some have issues with it; However, I have heard statements from both candidates that it will still be the “People’s Court.”
In doing some research, I have found that of the approximately 850 Justices of the Peace in Texas, only about 60 are attorneys. In my near 20 years in office meeting and getting to know many of my colleagues, I can honestly say that the best, most grounded JP’s that have had a relationship with are non-attorney JPs. There are also some terrible ones in both camps, regardless of party affiliation! And do not take that as I am saying attorney JPs are bad; some are really good. I have also found that across the State, there are some attorneys running against non-attorney candidates who are by far the better choice. I have good relationships with several attorney JPs and see the good they do in their courts. It is just my belief that the “People’s Court” is best served with a peer judge, which is why I believe the Texas Constitution set it up as such.
Since the constituents in JP2 do not have the choice of a “peer judge,” the question I am posing to you to answer is, “Which candidate has the better demeanor and qualities, not qualifications, to be your ‘peer judge’?” There is enough easily assessable information from both candidates on their positions and how they are highlighting themselves. It is very apparent that one candidate is focusing on attorney credentials and a desire to be a judge and one on a desire to be a public servant in the community who just happens to be an attorney. Because both have made public statements that politics do not belong in the courtroom, which I commend both for taking that stance, it really does come down to your decision on the type of person who you want to adjudicate the cases in your People’s Court.