10/21/2026
GCISD posted the agenda for the October 26 meeting and there is an action item to change the transfer policy.
Re-opening the free-for-all transfer system and repeating history is a really bad idea. And if this is where GCISD is headed, people need to understand the consequences.
For nearly a decade, GCISD had open enrollment for district residents with few restrictions. What we saw was a system of haves and have-nots. Some campuses flourished while others struggled mightily, undermining equitable access to quality education and the district’s long-term success.
That policy didn’t solve our enrollment problem. Declining enrollment occurred during that period and is still a reality.
So why are we considering going backward?
Two years ago, central administration brought transfer policy changes to the board to better balance enrollment, align staffing, manage class sizes and strengthen campuses. We’ve spent years working toward those goals, and now we’re considering undoing that work.
Moving hundreds of students affects staffing, GT and Special Education services, class sizes, extracurricular activities such as athletics, and fine arts, and campus stability. Some schools will benefit while others bear the consequences.
If those concerns were legitimate two years ago, what has changed?
I’m disappointed in the board majority, particularly the board president, if the priority is appeasing a political base rather than considering what’s best for the entire district. I’m equally disappointed if administration is unwilling to stand behind its recommendations because of political pressure.
Leadership means making decisions based on what’s right for students, not what’s easiest politically.
The focus should be on winning families back through high standards, academic excellence and outstanding extracurricular opportunities, not creating another system where some campuses thrive at the expense of others.
I’m encouraged that the revenue committee we started last year continues developing innovative revenue-generating ideas, and that the hybrid educational model we worked on over the past year is coming to fruition. I’m very thankful to Shannon Braun for GCISD School Board Place 1 and Kathy Florence-Spradley GCISD Board of Trustees Place 4 continually asking for updates and requesting this agenda item.
That’s how you move a district forward: innovative solutions, high academic standards, quality programs and a commitment to attracting the best educators and families.
GCISD is now an A-rated district (after being a B-rated district under the new metrics years before the conservative majority took control), we now have a Blue Ribbon high school, the highest AP scores in 15 years and growing National Merit recognition. We should build on that progress, not undermine it.
There’s also some irony in watching people who criticize school choice celebrate expanded transfers as “school choice” when it suits them. Parents deserve options, and they have options, but we cannot ignore the impact those choices have on the entire district.
We’ve been down this road before. Let’s not make the same mistake twice. When enrollment shifts create staffing problems, strain programs and put more campuses at risk, students and families will pay the price.
GCISD needs to move forward, not backward.