The fredrick Douglass Foundation of Indiana

SHOULD THERE BE A QUESTION HERE?
ARE THE POLICE ABOVE THE LAW?
The fact that I am asking this question should tell you that something is wrong!
Let us take a look at our society today and access the condition that we find ourselves in?
Lets take a look at our society from the standpoint of respecting the Rule of Law and its application in society today.
The political representatives in our country are elected by the people who show up at the polling places, and the people who get the most votes for themselves is elected and are sent to our State and Federal Government assemblies to pass the Laws that the police will use to enforce the laws that the Representatives pass into law. Then the law enforcement Officials (i.e. The Police) should enforce these laws uniformly for and against everyone equally. Not just to the black community or to any specific group, it is supposed to be applied equally for and against everyone equally! The question is are the Police above the law?
The main problem is that some people feel that the Rule of Law does not apply to them (ie. the Police). Some people feel that their good intentions or their needs or wants exempt them from the laws that have been past by the Legislatures. For example; some people feel that Pot (Ma*****na) is a gateway drug to addiction, for that reason they buy and sell it for their own pleasure even though there are thousands of people serving prison sentences because of there desires to use or sell Pot. They feel they should be exempt from the laws passed to stop the sale and use of that drug!
How about this one; Some people see another person breaking the law by stealing something, or assaulting someone else but they won’t come fourth to tell the authorities who the perpetrator is because they don’t want to be labeled as a Snitch or informant until they become the victim! Then they want the law to work for them but not for the other victims!
Now lets bring this into focus of what’s going on with the ex*****on of George Floyd.
Here we have a policeman arresting George for allegedly trying to pass an allegedly counterfeit $20 bill. The Police were called and they Removed him from his car and handcuffed him with his hands behind his back, then they put him in a police car, then they took him out of the car and threw him to the ground and then one of the officers spent over 8 Eight minutes with his knee in Georges’ throat while he begs them to let him up because George was pleading to them I can’t breath then he called for his Mother and finally dies from this assault from a male in a police uniform (he doesn’t qualify to be called a Man) as he smirked and smiled because he felt that he was above the Law while he Choked George to death. He knew exactly what he was doing all along! This was not an accident!
The one thing that sticks out in this matter more than anything else is not that we need another Law to stop this. Not that we need to protest over this abuse of power by a Uniformed Police Person. Nor is it the fact of the other three officers who stood by and let it happen and did nothing to stop it!
The thing that hurts me more than anything is that everything that I just pointed out to you is plainly already against the Law! And know one was trying to enforce the written law against the Policeman who perpetrated this assault on George!
Why is know one standing up and yelling ARE THE POLICE ABOVE THE LAW?
If the Police were standing by and saw this happen to a civilian man white or black would they wait 4 (four) days to arrest that perpetrator?
While the rightest anger and outrage of the public is well deserved, the blame for this crime lies directly at the feet of the public officials who refused to enforce the written laws that are on the books now! The police chief, the city council members, the Mayor, on up to the Governor! Why didn’t they insist that the law be in forced as speedily against the police as they do against the General Public?
Should the Police be held to the same standard of the Rule of Law as the General public?
Are the Police Above the Law? This officer ignored the existing law what makes you think he is going to obey another Law?
We do not need another Law! The answer to this question can solve this issue over Night!
All you need to do is hold the Police to the same laws that we hold the public to! Right now we have one Rule of law for the public, and a vague interpretation of the Law for the police department!
All our legislators have to do is make it clear that the police are not above the laws that they enforce on the public. The police are not above the law!
We do not need to defund our police departments! That would give the criminal elements in our society the green light to go crazy on the innocent public and Anarchy would destroy our Country from within!
If you need to write a new law Specifically for the police actions you could produce something that would set specific guidelines that would outline minimum penalties for police officers in assaults and homicides with specific minimum penalties in respect to the laws that are on the books now, or at the time of the incident. But in no case should the penalty be less than the penalty that would be given to the general public for these same crimes, or for abuse of power in the police department or for the political arena with a special penalty for those who withhold specific evidence of the crime or abuse especially if they were a party to the incident or a supervisor of the individuals involved in the incident!
WE DON’T NEED TO DEFUND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT!

Respectfully Submitted:
Rev. Carl L Kelley
[email protected]
317-432-7631 Cell

The
Frederick Douglass Foundation of Indiana


"Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress, rob and degrade them, neither persons nor property will be safe." Frederick Douglass
Every day I look at the power struggle in our nation’s Capital and the Demagoguery of the Democrats leadership and I can’t help reflecting back on the speech that Fredric Douglas gave on the meaning of the 4th of July for the Negro on July 5, 1852 and I can’t help but reflect back on the similarities of the political seen that they were experiencing compared to what we ae experiencing to day between Congress and the President. When I re-read this speech I can’t help but ask the questions about what we learned from then to now?
As you read this excerpt from this Douglas speech I want you to reflect on the parallel conditions of today verses then 1853.
Plus when you see the term Monarchy, or Tory, I want you to replace them with the term Democrat to draw comparison!
Remember this is the time leading up to the Supreme Court’s Decision in Dread Scott Case 1850 to 1857 concerning the freedom of Indentured Servants and Slaves. I will make further comments in later posts!
I want you to look at the structure of the democrat party and they Nancy Pelosi parades Afro-Americans before the cameras but systematically excludes them from any power discussion!
This typical of all Socialist Oligarchies, they always consolidate control to an elite group that doesn’t answer to anyone else in the Party, or share control with anyone outside of the inner-circle! (Which is Lilly White).

The Meaning of July Fourth for the Negro By Frederick Douglass
Speech Given in Rochester, New York, July 5, 1852

Fellow-citizens, I shall not presume to dwell at length on the associations that cluster about this day. The simple story of it is, that, 76 years ago, the people of this country were British subjects. The style and title of your "sovereign people" (in which you now glory) was not then born. You were under the British Crown. Your fathers esteemed the English Government as the home government; and England as the fatherland. This home government, you know, although a considerable distance from your home, did, in the exercise of its parental prerogatives, impose upon its colonial children, such restraints, burdens and limitations, as, in its mature judgment, it deemed wise, right and proper.

But your fathers, who had not adopted the fashionable idea of this day, of the infallibility of government, and the absolute character of its acts, presumed to differ from the home government in respect to the wisdom and the justice of some of those burdens and restraints. They went so far in their excitement as to pronounce the measures of government unjust, unreasonable, and oppressive, and altogether such as ought not to be quietly submitted to. I scarcely need say, fellow-citizens, that my opinion of those measures fully accords with that of your fathers. Such a declaration of agreement on my part would not be worth much to anybody. It would certainly prove nothing as to what part I might have taken had I lived during the great controversy of 1776. To say now that America was right, and England wrong, is exceedingly easy. Everybody can say it; the dastard, not less than the noble brave, can flippantly discant on the tyranny of England towards the American Colonies. It is fashionable to do so; but there was a time when, to pronounce against England, and in favor of the cause of the colonies, tried men's souls. They who did so were accounted in their day plotters of mischief, agitators and rebels, dangerous men. To side with the right against the wrong, with the weak against the strong, and with the oppressed against the oppressor! here lies the merit, and the one which, of all others, seems unfashionable in our day. The cause of liberty may be stabbed by the men who glory in the deeds of your fathers. But, to proceed.

Feeling themselves harshly and unjustly treated, by the home government, your fathers, like men of honesty, and men of spirit, earnestly sought redress. They petitioned and remonstrated; they did so in a decorous, respectful, and loyal manner. Their conduct was wholly unexceptionable. This, however, did not answer the purpose. They saw themselves treated with sovereign indifference, coldness and scorn. Yet they persevered. They were not the men to look back.

As the sheet anchor takes a firmer hold, when the ship is tossed by the storm, so did the cause of your fathers grow stronger as it breasted the chilling blasts of kingly displeasure. The greatest and best of British statesmen admitted its justice, and the loftiest eloquence of the British Senate came to its support. But, with that blindness which seems to be the unvarying characteristic of tyrants, since Pharaoh and his hosts were drowned in the Red Sea, the British Government persisted in the exactions complained of.

The madness of this course, we believe, is admitted now, even by England; but we fear the lesson is wholly lost on our present rulers.

Oppression makes a wise man mad. Your fathers were wise men, and if they did not go mad, they became restive under this treatment. They felt themselves the victims of grievous wrongs, wholly incurable in their colonial capacity. With brave men there is always a remedy for oppression. Just here, the idea of a total separation of the colonies from the crown was born! It was a startling idea, much more so than we, at this distance of time, regard it. The timid and the prudent (as has been intimated) of that day were, of course, shocked and alarmed by it.

Such people lived then, had lived before, and will, probably, ever have a place on this planet; and their course, in respect to any great change (no matter how great the good to be attained, or the wrong to be redressed by it), may be calculated with as much precision as can be the course of the stars. They hate all changes, but silver, gold and copper change! Of this sort of change they are always strongly in favor.

These people were called Tories in the days of your fathers; and the appellation, probably, conveyed the same idea that is meant by a more modern, though a somewhat less euphonious term, which we often find in our papers, applied to some of our old politicians.

Their opposition to the then dangerous thought was earnest and powerful; but, amid all their terror and affrighted vociferations against it, the alarming and revolutionary idea moved on, and the country with it.

On the 2nd of July, 1776, the old Continental Congress, to the dismay of the lovers of ease, and the worshipers of property, clothed that dreadful idea with all the authority of national sanction. They did so in the form of a resolution; and as we seldom hit upon resolutions, drawn up in our day, whose transparency is at all equal to this, it may refresh your minds and help my story if I read it.
"Resolved, That these united colonies are, and of right, ought to be free and Independent States; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown; and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, dissolved."

Citizens, your fathers made good that resolution. They succeeded; and to-day you reap the fruits of their success. The freedom gained is yours; and you, there fore, may properly celebrate this anniversary. The 4th of July is the first great fact in your nation's history-the very ringbolt in the chain of your yet undeveloped destiny.

Pride and patriotism, not less than gratitude, prompt you to celebrate and to hold it in perpetual remembrance. I have said that the Declaration of Independence is the ringbolt to the chain of your nation's destiny; so, indeed, I regard it. The principles contained in that instrument are saving principles. Stand by those principles, be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost.

From the round top of your ship of state, dark and threatening clouds may be seen. Heavy billows, like mountains in the distance, disclose to the leeward huge forms of flinty rocks! That bolt drawn, that chain broken, and all is lost. Cling to this day-cling to it, and to its principles, with the grasp of a storm-tossed mariner to a spar at midnight.

The coming into being of a nation, in any circumstances, is an interesting event. But, besides general considerations, there were peculiar circumstances which make the advent of this republic an event of special attractiveness. The whole scene, as I look back to it, was simple, dignified and sublime. The population of the country, at the time, stood at the insignificant number of three millions. The country was poor in the munitions of war. The population was weak and scattered, and the country a wilderness unsubdued. There were then no means of concert and combination, such as exist now. Neither steam nor lightning had then been reduced to order and discipline. From the Potomac to the Delaware was a journey of many days. Under these, and innumerable other disadvantages, your fathers declared for liberty and independence and triumphed.

Fellow Citizens, I am not wanting in respect for the fathers of this republic. The signers of the Declaration of Independence were brave men. They were great men, too-great enough to give frame to a great age. It does not often happen to a nation to raise, at one time, such a number of truly great men. The point from which I am compelled to view them is not, certainly, the most favorable; and yet I cannot contemplate their great deeds with less than admiration. They were statesmen, patriots and heroes, and for the good they did, and the principles they contended for, I will unite with you to honor their memory.

They loved their country better than their own private interests; and, though this is not the highest form of human excellence, all will concede that it is a rare virtue, and that when it is exhibited it ought to command respect. He who will, intelligently, lay down his life for his country is a man whom it is not in human nature to despise. Your fathers staked their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor, on the cause of their country. In their admiration of liberty, they lost sight of all other interests.

They were peace men; but they preferred revolution to peaceful submission to bo***ge. They were quiet men; but they did not shrink from agitating against oppression. They showed forbearance; but that they knew its limits. They believed in order; but not in the order of tyranny. With them, nothing was "settIed" that was not right. With them, justice, liberty and humanity were "final"; not slavery and oppression. You may well cherish the memory of such men. They were great in their day and generation. Their solid manhood stands out the more as we contrast it with these degenerate times.
How circumspect, exact and proportionate were all their movements! How unlike the politicians of an hour! Their statesmanship looked beyond the passing moment, and stretched away in strength into the distant future. They seized upon eternal principles, and set a glorious example in their defence. Mark them! Fully appreciating the hardships to be encountered, firmly believing in the right of their cause, honorably inviting the scrutiny of an on-looking world, reverently appealing to heaven to attest their sincerity, soundly comprehending the solemn responsibility they were about to assume, wisely measuring the terrible odds against them, your fathers, the fathers of this republic, did, most deliberately, under the inspiration of a glorious patriotism, and with a sublime faith in the great principles of justice and freedom, lay deep, the corner-stone of the national super-structure, which has risen and still rises in grandeur around you.

Of this fundamental work, this day is the anniversary. Our eyes are met with demonstrations of joyous enthusiasm. Banners and pennants wave exultingly on the breeze. The din of business, too, is hushed. Even mammon seems to have quitted his grasp on this day. The ear-piercing fife and the stirring drum unite their accents with the ascending peal of a thousand church bells. Prayers are made, hymns are sung, and sermons are preached in honor of this day; while the quick martial tramp of a great and multitudinous nation, echoed back by all the hills, valleys and mountains of a vast continent, bespeak the occasion one of thrilling and universal interest-nation's jubilee.

Friends and citizens, I need not enter further into the causes which led to this anniversary. Many of you understand them better than I do. You could instruct me in regard to them. That is a branch of knowledge in which you feel, perhaps, a much deeper interest than your speaker. The causes which led to the separation of the colonies from the British crown have never lacked for a tongue. They have all been taught in your common schools, narrated at your firesides, un folded from your pulpits, and thundered from your legislative halls, and are as familiar to you as household words. They form the staple of your national po etry and eloquence.

I remember, also, that, as a people, Americans are remarkably familiar with all facts which make in their own favor. This is esteemed by some as a national trait-perhaps a national weakness. It is a fact, that whatever makes for the wealth or for the reputation of Americans and can be had cheap! will be found by Americans. I shall not be charged with slandering Americans if I say I think the American side of any question may be safely left in American hands.

I leave, therefore, the great deeds of your fathers to other gentlemen whose claim to have been regularly descended will be less likely to be disputed than mine!

My business, if I have any here to-day, is with the present. The accepted time with God and His cause is the ever-living now.
Trust no future, however pleasant,
Let the dead past bury its dead;
Act, act in the living present,
Heart within, and God overhead.
We have to do with the past only as we can make it useful to the present and to the future. To all inspiring motives, to noble deeds which can be gained from the past, we are welcome. But now is the time, the important time. Your fathers have lived, died, and have done their work, and have done much of it well. You live and must die, and you must do your work. You have no right to enjoy a child's share in the labor of your fathers, unless your children are to be blest by your labors. You have no right to wear out and waste the hard-earned fame of your fathers to cover your indolence. Sydney Smith tells us that men seldom eulogize the wisdom and virtues of their fathers, but to excuse some folly or wickedness of their own. This truth is not a doubtful one. There are illustrations of it near and remote, ancient and modern. It was fashionable, hundreds of years ago, for the children of Jacob to boast, we have "Abraham to our father," when they had long lost Abraham's faith and spirit. That people contented themselves under the shadow of Abraham's great name, while they repudiated the deeds which made his name great. Need I remind you that a similar thing is being done all over this country to-day? Need I tell you that the Jews are not the only people who built the tombs of the prophets, and garnished the sepulchers of the righteous? Washington could not die till he had broken the chains of his slaves. Yet his monument is built up by the price of human blood, and the traders in the bodies and souls of men shout-"We have Washington to our father."-Alas! that it should be so; yet it is.
The evil, that men do, lives after them,
The good is oft interred with their bones.
Fellow-citizens, pardon me, allow me to ask, why am I called upon to speak here to-day? What have I, or those I represent, to do with your national independence? Are the great principles of political freedom and of natural justice, embodied in that Declaration of Independence, extended to us? and am I, therefore, called upon to bring our humble offering to the national altar, and to confess the benefits and express devout gratitude for the blessings resulting from your independence to us?

This is a an excert from the speech that Fredric Douglass gave in New York on July 5, 1852!
I will refer to this article in future posts.
Rev. Carl L. Kelley

We are in a spiritual War with Secular Humanism, Socialism and Ante-Christian values!
I want to be clear that in my opinion is nothing more than putting lipstick on a Pig to make it more appealing to the dumbed down millennial generation that were never taught what our country was designed to be.
This country was founded on the principle of Freedom, Independence, Freedom from religious persecution, freedom from a Monarchy, and freedom to ownership of property! This country was not founded on the principle that we must redistribute our individual wealth and prosperity to those less fortunate than we are. Nor was it founded on the equal wealth to everyone regardless of what you choose to work for or take a risk to invest in!
Socialism, Communism, and Secular Humanism are not compatible with our Representative Republic. This path can only lead to Indentured servitude to the Government, then total loose of our Religious freedoms, freedom itself, or Slavery to the Oligarchies of the government! People will no longer work for themselves; they will be forced to work to give the Government over 50% of what you earn from your Job or your business’s. Personally I would want to have another civil war to maintain the Representative Republic that Our fore Fathers fought and died for in the revolutionary war of 1776.
We must also look at what this movement has done to our Religious values and our faith in the promise of our eternal destiny with God the Creator. This movement’s primary goal is to deny the existence of our God our Creator in order to replace him with Socialist, Humanist Oligarchy that only seeks to maintain control of the Government and our financial future.
I never thought that in my lifetime I would live to see a major political party advocate the overthrow our Representative Republic and promote replacing it with a Socialists system that has never worked anywhere it’s been tried in the hundreds of years that it’s been around! They are advocating that we change our Government to a system that is guaranteed to fail.
We must start by showing the world that God created us and devised a plan for us. God is the heart of what we are all about! Showing that God sent his Son to pay the price for the choices of Adam and Eve that plunged the world into Sin and Damnation that condemned the whole world and all things living to experience evil and must go through the door of Death!
As we look at the challenges that the enemy (Satan) has cast on us, we can see that God is not through with us yet.
When we look at the way the enemy (Satan) is attacking our families, our Children and our Government, the only thing that we can surmise is that the fight is not over!
Let’s look at all of violence that is happening in our country today?
We see the low value that many have on human Life through Abortion, school shootings. Asalts on Police officers, and the denial of the existence of God altogether! We see the news media siding with the LGBT movement who holds to the attitude that the Christian community is persecuting them because our 4000 year old belief that men shouldn’t have s*x with men and women shouldn’t have s*x with women, is somehow out of date and is now considered to be discrimination because we choose not to go against the over 4000 year old doctrine of marriage that says any s*x outside of the bounds of a marriage between a man and a woman is sinful in the eyes of God, is Homophobic and Discriminatory in their eyes.
We see the Socialist Gun control groups, and the Black lives’ matter crowd, fanning the flames of racial division seeking the goal of driving us apart with class warfare, so they can come in and save us from the horrors of racial prejudice and bigotry!

How do we Honor our Civil Rights History?
Today I watched President Trump go to the Dedication of the Civil Rights museum in Mississippi to Honor the people who endured the indignation of the Pro-Segregationist Democratic party during the 1960’s where the Democratic party resisted all of the legislation that the Republicans had past for the Civil Rights of African Americans in the United States, like the 1965 Civil Rights Act (which was first proposed by Dwight D Eisenhower in 1957), the Black Codes and the Jim Crow laws that interfered with their constitutional right to Vote, the Democrats promoted Segregation and the separate but equal segregationist crowd, the Democrats blocked the anti-lynching legislation in 1924, The Democrats tried to block the 1871 Anti-kkk bill calling for the Klan to stop the violence against the former slaves and their supporters, plus the republicans supported every civil rights bill that passed and the Democrats Unanimously fought against every one of them including the 1965 civil rights act.
In 1865 the Democrats organized, financed, and supported the first United States Terrorist organization The Ku Klux Klan, and gave them a mandate to use Violence, intimidation, and Murder to stop the Blacks and White Republican from implementing the plan for the reconstruction of our nation, in order to regain control of congress again!
I thank God that the Abolitionist spirit didn’t die out with the end of the Civil War.
I applaud President Trump for honoring this memorial to the evils of Segregation and Racial Prejudice that the Democratic party perpetrated on our Nation and the valor of those like Medgar Evans who fought and died for in that fight against the Evils of Segregation in our country!
No wonder those so called Democrat civil rights leader boycotted the dedication ceremonial event today, it may be because they wanted to deflect the truth that the Democrat party is the home of racial prejudice and division in our country!
The darkness of Racial Prejudice and segregation can’t stand the light of the truth that they (the Democrat Party) have done more to divide our nation, and to promote racial hatred equal only to Hitler’s hatred of the Jews, in the last 60 years than anything that any foreign Nation could have ever dreamed of!
The Democrat Party is trying to destroy us from within, not from the outside!
For instance they claim that President Trump conspired with the Russians to defeat Hillary Clintons presidential bid (with absolutely no evidence of collusion or conspiracy); But it was the Democrats who had the Russian Ambassador setting in front of congress during the first State of the Union speech early this year! If they were so afraid of the Russians why did they have them leading their assembly?
It was the Democrat party lead by President Obama and Hillary Clinton who sold 20% of the United States Uranium reserves to the Russians and received Hundreds of Millions of dollars into their private coffers. Not the Republicans!
WHO IS REALLY THE TRATOR HERE WITH THE RUSSIANS? The Democrat Party!

I ASK YOU AGAIN WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE TRUTH?
ARE WE HONORING OUR CIVIL RIGHTS HISTORY BY BOYCOTTING THE LEADER OF THE PARTY WHO FAUGHT FOR THOSE RIGHTS AT THIS MOMENT OF DEDICATION AND HONOR?
WHATS WRONG WITH THE TRUTH?

Respectfully Submitted: Rev. Carl L Kelley

The Fredrick Douglass Foundation of Indiana

ARE WE OUR OWN WORST ENEMY?
When I look at the headlines In the News these days there always seems to be an article about Police brutality or How Black lives matter!
While on the one hand I can see the concerns of the community about how minorities are treated when they are stopped by police and the potential for the possibility of a violent altercation occurring at that point, I have to look back on my experience with black people and with the police.
When I listen to people talk about the issue it’s always about how the police over-react or how they abuse their authority with young black men. I almost never hear about how we teach our young men to act when they encounter a policeman on the streets. I almost always hear about how they should go on the defense to protect their dignity, and to maintain their pride to show the cop that he can’t push them around. Forgetting the fact that the police officer doesn’t know what he is stepping into until he approaches them and begins to speak. How they react at that moment sets the tone for the whole encounter!
In my experience this whole situation will be choreographed by what they think of the Rule of Law!
If they have a respect for the rule of law the possibility of a violent encounter is reduced dramatically!
Too many times I see our young men go into a defensive mode simply because they have been taught that the police are out to get them, and they need to be ready to defend themselves at a moment’s notice, when in fact there is nothing to defend, thereby setting the stage for a violent encounter unnecessarily.
An example of how we train them to disrespect the Rule of Law is what we teach them about cannabis or Pot the street name. Most of them are taught that it’s not bad, or it’s Ok to use it and the police are using it to mess with the black man. Not that it is an illegal substance that carries a jail sentence if you get caught with it!
Their attitude toward the Rule of Law will determine what the outcome will be in an encounter with police.
Look at the attitude of young women is not much better. I have a niece who spent two years in prison because she had pot in the ashtray of a car on Elementary school property when she picked up her child from school!
Here again showing no respect for the rule of Law!
I see the outrage for the police action shooting and the out of proportion arrests of blacks for violent crimes but when you see the statistics on who is committing the violence it’s disturbing to say the least.
IT IS BLACK PEOPLE WHO ARE KILLING BLACK PEOPLE, NOT THE POLICE! NOT WHITE PEOPLE!
Over 72% of all murder victims and suspects in Indianapolis were black people, and we are only 27% of the population of Indianapolis (less than 12% of the population Nationaly) and only one of them was killed by a Policeman this year!
Where is your selective outrage and discussed about that?
Where is your selective outrage about the rate of black on black violence in our city? The percentages are about the same!
Where is your selective outrage over the fact that Black woman are limiting our population growth to almost zero through abortion; through the killing of almost 26,000,000 babies since 1973 when Roe vs. Wade went into effect.
Why don’t I hear any of your selective outrage about these numbers?
The black community itself has done more to limit its own population growth, dilute its political voice, and destroy the black family than any policeman or white politician or white person has done combined!
IF BLACK LIVES REALLY MATTERED, WHY DON’T I HEAR YOUR OUTRAGE AND INDIGNATION ABOUT THESE FACTS, INSTEAD OF POLITICAL RHETORIC OR TALKING POINTS ON THE NEWS EVERY NIGHT!
What can we do to restore Pride and value in the black family or the lives of black people; to restore the sanctity in Marriage between a man and a woman, which was the very first covenant man made with God; and re-instill the pride in the intact family with a man in the home heading the family!
After all, it wasn’t the police who use black woman as s*xual objects to Conker, and count as trophies or notches on his belt! It is Black Men who do that. The police don’t make black Men and women lay down and use the God given process for procreation, (have S*x for reproducing the human race) as a recreational pleasure tool, and then seek to destroy the very product that the process was designed to produce through abortion! (The killing of A Baby).
From what I’ve been able to ascertain this promotion of the selective annihilation of the black race was promoted primarily here in the United States back in the 1920’s and 30’s by Margaret Sanger along with the Socialist party and the Democratic Party. In Margaret Sanger’s own words;
Margaret Sanger, the founder of the precursor to Planned Parenthood, conceived and implemented The Negro Project. And what was The Negro Project? It was a program to enlist the aid of articulate African Americans with engaging personalities to talk with black preachers and urge them to promote birth control and abortion in the black community. Why? Because Sanger believed that blacks and other minorities were inferior to white people with ancestry from northern Europe. Here is an excerpt of a letter written by Margaret Sanger to Dr. Clarence Gamble in 1939
“We propose to hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. And we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members”.
If Margret Sanger could see the results of her efforts to annihilate the black race today undoubtedly she would be doing cartwheels in celebration of her dream of convincing our black women that destroying our future generations for the sake of convenience, economic limitations, carrier advancement, and social acceptance is the best thing they could do for their family, she couldn’t be more pleased with the results of her movement. She found a way to convince black women that the fruit of their womb is a plague on society and it must be destroyed at all costs!
For the life of me I can’t understand how a few killings by policeman (Unjustly or Justified) deserves more outrageous indignation than the Righteous indignation that should be expressed over the millions of deaths through Abortion, Black on Black crime, the disdain for the rule of law that a majority of black people in the minority community seems to express.
TELL ME WHO IS THE WORST ENEMY OF THE BLACK COMMUNITY?
WHO IS REALLY KILLING OFF THE BLACK RACE?

Respectfully submitted;

The Fredrick Douglass Foundation of Indiana
Rev. Carl L. Kelley
[email protected]