Capitol Wire USA

Directions

Capitol Wire USA CWU MEDIA
USA Politics news
daily basis news
facts updates and freedom

10/09/2026

Here’s something you don’t hear everyday. The White House has identified a group in urgent need of protection from workplace discrimination: white men.

At a press conference today with Vice President JD Vance about alleged work visa fraud, FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson praised the administration’s efforts to protect white men from discrimination on the job.

He singled out EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas for taking up the cause, saying her predecessors refused to address it.

Lucas has been sounding the alarm. Last December, she posted a video specifically urging white men who believe they’ve faced workplace discrimination to file complaints.

Where does this head next?

10/09/2026

The US government suspended top Indian IT giants including Infosys, Tata, Wipro, HCL, and Cognizant from the Permanent Labor Certification Program. The sudden move prevents these outsourcing firms from sponsoring foreign employees for US green cards. Thousands of Indian tech professionals now face massive career uncertainty, expired visas, and looming threats of forced return.

10/08/2026

Neighbors, this is wild. President Donald Trump says he “could’ve done very bad things” to Hillary Clinton and former Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama but claims he chose not to because he believed the presidency should be treated with respect.
________
Wednesday in the Oval Office while discussing his belief that Democrats would try to impeach him again if they regain control of Congress. He was asked what they would impeach him for, Trump replied, “They don’t know,” before adding, “I could’ve done very bad things to Hillary Clinton. I could’ve done very, very bad things to Joe Biden. I could’ve done very bad things to Barack Hussein Obama.”
________
Trump said he initially considered going after rivals inappropriate, but argued his two impeachments changed his perspective. “Then I found out that they impeached me twice,” he said, adding, “I certainly, to this moment, I can do whatever I want, if I want. They’ve done some very bad things.”

10/06/2026

Trump says Iran should attack American cities: “Let ’em take out Los Angeles and San Diego. This is a very small price to pay.”

10/05/2026

In this street-interview social experiment, an interviewer compares how two opposing political crowds react when a Black man is introduced into their respective groups.

The first segment takes place among **Trump supporters**, where the man is greeted with handshakes, hugs, and friendly conversations. Several people emphasize that his race does not change how they view or welcome him.

The experiment then moves to a group of **anti-Trump demonstrators**, where the atmosphere appears noticeably more confrontational. The interviewer and the man encounter hostile reactions, including verbal insults and profanity from people in the crowd.

The contrasting reactions quickly became the focus of the clip, with viewers debating whether the interaction reveals meaningful differences between the two political groups or simply reflects the behavior of individuals in particular crowds.

The experiment ultimately raises broader questions about **political polarization, race, tolerance, and how people respond to those they perceive as belonging to an opposing political side**.

10/05/2026

FACTS TOTALLY SHUT DOWN THIS ARGUMENT!

10/04/2026

On Piers Morgan Uncensored, Piers Morgan questioned journalist and non-binary activist Laurie Penny about their use of the term “non-binary” and the pronouns “they/them.” Penny explained that non-binary identity exists outside traditional categories of man and woman and defended singular “they” as an established feature of the English language. Morgan challenged the explanation by asking how a plural pronoun can refer to one person and whether Penny was biologically female. Penny declined to discuss biological anatomy on television, while Blaire White argued that gender concepts should be explainable in straightforward language if they are being presented to the wider public. The exchange brought together competing approaches to s*x, gender identity and language. It also highlighted the distinction between biological definitions used in some legal and policy contexts and social terminology used by people describing their personal identities. The discussion ultimately centered on whether evolving language and identity categories can coexist with traditional definitions of s*x. Singular “they” has a long history in English, while questions surrounding non-binary identity remain part of a wider cultural and political debate over terminology, biology and individual expression.

10/04/2026

Texas Representative James Talarico speaks on the House floor during debate over HB 229, legislation concerning legal definitions of biological s*x and government collection of related information. In the clip, Talarico responds to an earlier argument invoking Genesis to support the bill. He asks Representative Joséy García González whether Genesis describes creation through pairs such as male and female, day and night, land and sea, and flying birds and swimming fish. Talarico then points to examples that exist between those apparent opposites, including dusk and dawn, coral reefs, estuaries, beaches, penguins, dolphins, and platypuses. His argument is that the biblical imagery should not automatically be treated as requiring rigid boundaries in every context. He then says Genesis should not be used to “bully, discriminate, or pick on people who have less power.” González agrees with his questions, and Talarico continues by arguing that religious scripture should be understood through its teachings about loving neighbors and caring for vulnerable people. The tone remains measured and deliberate rather than confrontational, while lawmakers behind him listen. The clip cuts while Talarico is continuing his argument. How should lawmakers balance religious interpretation with legislation? 
The Texas House record confirms that Talarico made this Genesis-based argument during HB 229 debate, including the examples involving dusk, dawn, penguins, dolphins, and platypuses.
🇺🇸

10/03/2026

A representative from Hong Kong delivers an impassioned address at the United Nations Human Rights Council, sharply criticizing Western nations for perceived hypocrisy on global human rights. In a widely circulated speech, the speaker directly confronts delegates from the United States, Britain, and NATO member states over their foreign policies and internal governance.

The speech took place during a session of the UN Human Rights Council, where member states routinely review global civil liberties, conflict zones, and international compliance with human rights standards. As Western nations often lead criticisms of political freedoms in other regions, representatives from allied regions regularly use the forum to highlight counter-arguments and systemic issues within Western democracies.

In the video, the speaker questions what moral authority Western nations possess when critiquing others. He highlights domestic issues in the U.S. and Britain—citing income inequality, historical poverty reduction efforts in China, and local arrests over online speech—before accusing NATO countries of ignoring conflicts in Gaza. He concludes by declaring that human rights should not be used as diplomatic bargaining chips or political weapons.

The video generated significant engagement across international media platforms, drawing mixed responses from viewers. Supporters commended the speaker for calling out double standards and challenging Western dominance in international institutions, while critics argued the remarks served as a political distraction to deflect scrutiny from civil liberty concerns closer to home.

The exchange reflects ongoing geopolitical tension over how human rights are defined, monitored, and applied globally. While Western governments emphasize individual political liberties and international law, non-Western leaders increasingly challenge these standards, demanding equal accountability and pushing back against foreign criticism in international forums.

10/03/2026

🚨 Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) just dropped a bombshell chart on the House floor claiming refiners’ profits jumped from $15 to $117 per barrel nearly 800% while farmers, truckers, and everyday drivers get crushed at the pump. He’s introducing export controls to keep American diesel in America and urging President Trump and VP Vance to force Congress to act, saying the companies are prioritizing foreign sales over U.S. consumers.
This raw moment lands amid ongoing debates over energy prices, DOJ probes into industry practices, and the Trump administration’s focus on affordability leaving viewers to decide if it’s greed, market forces, or policy failure driving the pain at the pump.




Address

123 Main Street, Apt 4B
New York, NY
10001

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Capitol Wire USA posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share