03/20/2026
The History behind Bakerville School and the Bakerville Consolidated School.
As I write this note, we are now three meetings into our “School Facility Utilization Study”, the last of which occurred at Bakerville Consolidated School last Wednesday evening (11th) when roughly 40 people came out to listen. The study in large part has been put in place as a result of long-term enrollment decline. Have you been following along?
We in New Hartford have a long history of these types of studies - the last of which was completed 10 years ago when the local student population had declined to just 475 students. In December of 2015, our local Board of Education voted to close Bakerville Consolidated School with very little notice. It was a shock to our community. After many meetings, and some spirited debate, a non-binding referendum was held asking the question: Should the Bakerville Consolidated School Be Closed? Ultimately the Town voted to “Save Bakerville School” and three local elementary schools remain in use today.
Some may ask: Why go through this again? Well student population continues to decline (now at 441 students – locally with significant decline also occurring at Regional 7) and as you all aware costs (and your taxes) continue to rise. A fact highlighted during evaluation of NHES roof last summer when it was revealed that the 24,000 square foot school building served only 95 students – and that this low level of enrollment could dramatically impact our eligibility for state grant funding (forcing our residents/taxpayers to pay an even larger share of the roof cost). When our consultants asked about enrollment at our “other school”, they were surprised to learn that a town of 6,600 people had three elementary schools – not just two. I’ve searched the state for towns with populations under 10,000 residents and to this day, I have yet to find another community with more than two elementary schools (I plan to do a future FB post on how I believe we came to have our three schools).
My personal thought is that these studies are good for the Town. They either confirm that we’re heading in the right direction, or they let us know that perhaps some modifications need to be made – and they tell us that with data void of personal opinion (the engineers are experts who don’t have a personal stake in the outcome).
Let me tell you about the history of Bakerville School and how the Bakerville Consolidated School came to be… It started with – you guessed it - another study.
Many years ago, there were four elementary schools on the south side of New Hartford. That’s right…four separate schools in the second district. These included the Bakerville School (now the Bakerville Library on Maple Hollow Road), the Merrill School House (on South Road), the Southeast School House (on Southeast Road) and get this…the “Harwinton Fractional Share School” (yes, we had a regionalized elementary school with Harwinton) on East Cotton Hill Road. Who knew!
Pre-1940…the town conducted a similar utilization “study” which led to the construction of the new Bakerville Consolidated School on Cedar Lane. That study…not unlike the one we’re undertaking now…helped define our direction for the future.
Ultimately after several attempts to scuttle the project in 1938 and 1939, the Bakerville Consolidated School was finally approved in May of 1940. This would merge the four south side schools into one new “consolidated” school (thus the school name).
Town residents approved a whopping $40,000 to build the school which included three classrooms and an auditorium (that was subsequently expanded over time).
The original building was completed in 1941. On September 29, 1941, sale of the Merrill and Southeast Schools were approved. In May of 1944, the Harwinton Fractional Share School was approved for sale and the original Bakerville School was gifted to the “Bakerville Community Association” for $1 – and with the efforts of Barbara Yedlin and her “little red wagon” it became the Bakerville Library. Just a couple of years later another study led to the creation of New Hartford Elementary School (that I wrote about a couple of weeks ago).
Much can be learned in the Town Clerks office at Town Hall. I frequently call Lynn and Sharon (who work there) our “Librarians” for all things "New Hartford". Much of this good history is recorded in the “Town Meeting Minutes”, that have recorded our towns official actions since our inception in 1738. Town Meetings (separate from Selectmen or Board of Education routine meetings) happened much more frequently 80 years ago – sometimes once or twice a month. The meetings typically started at 8pm…and could run late into the night…and there were conceptual “fights” to be had about the future direction of our town.
Many times, in reading these old minutes (which are recorded in brief snippets – far less than the standard minutes taken at today’s meetings), just when you thought the Town had settled on how we would be handling a specific situation (either procedurally, monetarily, or both), there would be an attempt to modify or negate that result at the very next Town Meeting just a couple of weeks later. Some of the biggest fights at Town Meetings in the early days dealt with the sale of alcohol, the use of motorboats on West Hill Pond and whether or not we should join Northwestern Regional #7.
As many of you know, I grew up here in New Hartford in a very large family with five brothers….and we all attended local schools. Not sure how my parents pulled that off…physically and financially – but one thing is clear: there are few families now with more than two children. With that comes the question: Can we consolidate schools? Will that save our residents any money? Are there other uses for these facilities? Perhaps a consolidation effort may not save a lot of money, but would the effort allow us to provide a better and/or different service to our residents by modifying the use of one of our current school facilities? Time will tell.
I hope this account reminds us all, that in this past scenario, our town worked together to change our future. It took time, thoughtful study and debate – and yes some taxpayer money. But the result was great (for that time and place in our history) – and in that particular instance – our residents chose to consolidate our south side schools to provide efficiencies. They sold off some surplus property - and (through our gift) helped an older former school building find a new purpose. A new Library was created that still exists and thrives to this day.
Now I’m not trying to direct you to a specific outcome before the process has even finished – but without this study (hopefully completed with all of your participation) we can’t really understand the wants and needs of our residents. Meetings have been somewhat lightly attended and all that’s really missing is YOU! Remember virtual attendance is available – so you can tune in from home!
At the last meeting, a facilities study was released that documented several Million dollars in costs for all three school buildings. Let’s be clear, the purpose of this study was not an attempt to sell you on an expensive building project. Nothing could be further from the truth. This study was proposed to seek efficiencies in utilization - plain and simple.
The report produced is an engineer’s view of the three schools – that included many redundant expenses. Some were “condition” related and some were “code” related. This is not to say that once a school building (or any type of building for that matter) is built that a few years later we as taxpayers must “automatically” bring everything up to today’s code. That’s not true. That said, if we voluntarily decide to renovate a structure, that portion of the building does have to meet current code requirements.
Soon to be released will be a population study. Again, this will give us estimates on how many new children will arrive (in the next few years) and how many classroom spaces we will need to have prepared to service these future students. Again, really good data to have on a go forward basis. Population studies can make me a bit nervous, because our Town has received poor estimates in the past and made decisions to accommodate students that never materialized.
Your Board of Selectmen is not afraid of change. Nor are we afraid to invest in our facilities or our future…but it has to make sense.
All that’s missing from the process is you and your good ideas for our future. In my years of working in Town Government, both as a member of the Board of Education (R7) and as your First Selectman, I’ve found that good ideas rarely have a hard time getting approved.
What ideas do you have?
Please keep an eye on the New Hartford Public Schools website https://www.newhtfd.org/.../school-facility-utilization... for meeting agendas, minutes and any other information that may be posted regarding this task force and the study.
Stay Involved in the process! The next meeting is on Wednesday, March 25, 2026 at Ann Antolini and it starts at 7pm.
Thanks!
Dan

03/20/2026
03/17/2026
03/13/2026
02/27/2026
02/27/2026
02/23/2026
02/22/2026
02/19/2026
01/26/2026
01/25/2026
01/20/2026