Fathers Against Injustice & Immoral Recognition

How to Prevent Parental Alienation — National Parents Organization Website https://www.sharedparenting.org/sharedparentingnews/how-to-prevent-parental-alienation

Help fund more futures like Santorio's!
Let's go ALL In for the Future. Click here to DONATE. - https://bit.ly/DONATE2CFUF
Click here to read more about how you're empowering generations in CFUF's 2025 Impact Report - https://bit.ly/CFUF2025IMPACTREPORT

I'm a divorce attorney for celebrities and the ultrawealthy. My advice is to treat marriage like a business transaction. A divorce attorney for celebrities and high-profile business leaders says certain transactions made during a marriage can make divorce more difficult.

Mass shootings are part of society’s boy crisis We blame mass shootings on replacement theory-style hatred, access to guns, poor family values, violence in the media and video games and mental illness. But our daughters live in the same families…

Fatherhood and Family Bonding Podcast. Take a listen for some nuggets!

Fatherhood and Family Bonding: Insights with Mark and Corey Perlman Welcome to another inspiring episode of the "I Am Dad" podcast. Today, we have the privilege of hosting two remarkable individuals who have made significant ...

Long term effects of fatherhood which non-fathers never face!!

Fatherhood Poses a Serious Hidden Health Risk Other Men Don't Face Later in life, fathers have poorer heart health compared to non-fathers, according to findings from the first longitudinal, multi-ethnic US study to look at fatherhood and cardiovascular health.

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BE A PARENT CASE LAWS

• The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that severance in the parent-child relationship caused by the state occur only with rigorous protections for individual liberty interests at stake. The parent-child relationship is a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.

746 f 2d 1205, 1242-45; US Ct. App 7th Cir WI (1985)
Carson v. Elrod

• No bond is more precious and none should be more zealously protected by the law as the bond between parent and child. 411 F Supp 645, 649; DC E.D. VA (1976)
Doe v. Irwin (US. D. C. of Michigan 1985)

• The rights of parents to the care, custody and nurture of their children is of such character that it cannot be denied without violating those fundamental principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all our civil and political institutions, and such right is a fundamental right protected by this amendment (First) and Amendments 5, 9, and 14.
Doe et al, v. Heck et al (7th Cir. Ct. App. 2003)

• The practice of "no prior consent" interview of a child, will ordinarily constitute a "clear violation" of the constitutional rights of parents under the 4th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The investigative interview of a child constitutes a "search and seizure" and, when conducted on private property without "consent, a warrant, probable cause, or exigent circumstances (imminent danger)," such an interview is an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the rights of the parent, child, and, possibly of the private property.
Elrod v. Burns (96 S. Ct. 1976)

• Loss of First Amendment Freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury. Though First Amendment rights are not absolute, they may be curtailed only by interests of vital importance, the burden of proving which rests on their government.
Franz v. U.S.

• A parent's right to the preservation of his relationship with his child derives from the fact that the parent's achievement of a rich and rewarding life is likely to depend significantly on his ability to participate in the rearing of his children. A child's corresponding right to protection from interference in the relationship derives from the psychic importance to him of being raised by a loving, responsible, reliable adult. 707 F 2d 582, 595-599; US Ct App (1983)
Griswold v. Connecticut

• The Constitution also protects "the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters" Federal Courts (and State Courts), under Griswold can protect, under the "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" phrase of the Declaration of Independence, the right of a man to enjoy the mutual care, company, love and affection of his children, and this cannot be taken away from him without due process of law. There is a family right to privacy, which the state cannot invade or it becomes actionable for civil rights damages. 381 US 479, (1965)
Gross v. State of Illinois

• State Judges, as well as federal, have the responsibility to respect and protect persons from violations of federal constitutional rights. 312 F 2d 257; (1963)
In the Interest of Cooper (Kansas 1980)

• Parent's interest in custody of their children is a liberty interest which has received considerable constitutional protection; a parent who is deprived of custody of his or her child, even though temporarily, suffers thereby grievous loss and such loss deserves extensive due process protection.
In re J.S. and C.

• A parent's right to care and companionship of his or her children are so fundamental, as to be guaranteed protection under the First, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. 324 A 2d 90; supra 129 NJ Super, at 489.
Kelson v. Springfield (US Ct. App 9th Cir. 1985)

• The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (California) held that the parent-child relationship is a constitutionally protected liberty interest. (See: Declaration of Independence--life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution -- No state can deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law nor deny any person the equal protection of the laws.) 767 F 2d 651; US Ct. App 9th Cir, 1985
Langton v. Maloney (527 F Supp 538, D.C. Conn. 1981)

• The liberty interest of the family encompasses an interest in retaining custody of one's children and, thus, a state may not interfere with a parent's custodial rights absent due process protections.
Matter of Delaney (617 P 2d 886, Oklahoma 1980) verify citation

• Parents have a fundamental constitutionally protected interest in continuity of legal bond with their children.

Matter of Gentry

• A parent's right to the custody of his or her children is an element of "liberty" guaranteed by the 5th Amendment and the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution. 369 NW 2d 889, MI App Div (1983)
May v. Anderson (73 S. Ct. 840 1952)

• The United States Supreme Court noted that a parent's right to "the companionship, care, custody and management of his or her children" is an interest "far more precious" than any property right. 345 US 528, 533; 73 S. Ct. 840, 843 (1952)
Meyer v. Nebraska (43 S. Ct. 625 1923)

• Parent's rights have been recognized as being "essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free man." 262 US 390; 43 S. Ct. 625 (1923)
Nicholson v. Williams