11/02/2026
First I want to say that the concern about the mural itself was legitimate, especially in today's political climate. The superintendent agreed and dealt with the situation. My concern is with how Tyler handled the situation, particularly after the superintendent had agreed to address it. I think the public deserves to know the answers to the following questions. Unfortunately I will not be at the meeting on Monday as I am out of town. Hopefully these questions or some like them are asked and answered.
1. Initial Investigation
Did Tyler go around the high school campus during a sporting event specifically looking for things to photograph?
Was the mural brought to his attention by a parent of a currently enrolled high school student?
Did he attempt to understand the mural's history or context before taking photographs and escalating the issue?
2. Communications With the Superintendent
Did Tyler threaten to publicly expose or criticize the school unless the superintendent removed the mural?
Did the superintendent agree that the mural was controversial and should be removed?
Did Tyler initially agree to give the superintendent time to handle the matter?
If so, what changed the following day that caused him to abandon that understanding?
Did he notify the superintendent or board president before going public?
3. Social Media and Political Involvement
Was Tyler aware that the superintendent had already agreed to address the mural before posting it publicly?
Why did he feel it was necessary to publish the controversy after an administrative resolution was already underway?
Why did he tag numerous politicians, political organizations, PACs, and news outlets?
Did his post acknowledge that the superintendent had already agreed to remove the mural?
What was he hoping to accomplish through the public post that had not already been accomplished through the superintendent?
4. Board Authority and Communication
Did Tyler contact the Board President before escalating the matter publicly?
Did he consider requesting a special board meeting or discussing the concern through established board procedures?
Did he involve or consult any other board members? If so, who?
Did he make any statements or give any directions that suggested he was acting with the authority of the full Board rather than as an individual member?
5. Legal Counsel and Taxpayer Expenses
Did Tyler independently contact the district's legal counsel regarding the mural?
How many separate conversations or communications did he have with counsel?
How many billable hours resulted from those communications, and what did they cost the district?
Were those consultations authorized under the Board's established procedures?
Can the Treasurer provide an accounting of all legal expenses associated with this incident, distinguishing Tyler's direct consultations from the district's response?
6. Community Response and Accountability
Did Tyler attempt to file a harassment complaint against community members following the controversy? If so, what conduct was alleged?
What documented disruption, additional expense, or other consequences resulted from the public controversy?
Looking back, does Tyler believe he handled this situation appropriately?
Would he do anything differently?
I think every one of these questions deserve a public response.