PLM - Partido Lakas ng Masa

  • Home
  • PLM - Partido Lakas ng Masa
Call Directions Website Contact the organization

PLM - Partido Lakas ng Masa It was founded on Jan. 2009. What is Partido Lakas ng Masa (PLM)? The PLM is more than a party-list organization. The PLM is more than an electoral organization.

Partido Lakas ng Masa (PLM) or Party of the Labouring Masses is a certified National Political Party since 2011 and is now running for partylist for the 2019 elections. PLM is a political party that was born from the unity of various mass organizations of workers and the poor to form a political party that will serve as a viable instrument in the political struggle of the masses. PLM counts from among its ranks the broad sector and sections of the working class and the toiling masses – the industrial workers, urban poor, farmers and agricultural workers, vendors, teachers, tricycle drivers, jeepney drivers, youth and students, women and other marginalized sectors of Philippine society. It intervenes and field candidates in the local, district and national elections. It advances the interests of the toiling masses through mass struggles. It recognizes the election as an arena of struggle, but it intervenes in the election not in the traditional form of campaigning but in ways and forms that raises the level of mobilization and struggles of the masses.

PLM: STOP THE SINO-PHOBIA — DEFEND EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL EXCHANGESThe reported withdrawal of around 150 Chinese volun...
04/10/2026

PLM: STOP THE SINO-PHOBIA — DEFEND EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL EXCHANGES

The reported withdrawal of around 150 Chinese volunteer and dispatched teachers from Chinese-language schools across the Philippines is deeply concerning.

At the same time, Filipino teachers working in China are also part of the educational and cultural exchanges that connect our two countries. Their work, like that of Chinese teachers in the Philippines, should not be subjected to blanket suspicion or treated as a security threat simply because of their nationality or the country where they teach.

According to reports, the Chinese teachers are being returned to China amid heightened security scrutiny of Chinese-linked educational exchanges, following warnings by Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro Jr. that academic and educational exchanges with China could potentially be used for intelligence gathering.

We reject the growing securitisation of education, culture and people-to-people exchanges.

Chinese teachers are educators, not spies. Filipino teachers in China are educators, not agents of a foreign power. Chinese-language education is not a national-security threat. Academic and cultural exchanges should not be treated as extensions of military or intelligence operations simply because they involve China.

The Philippines must not allow the United States-China strategic rivalry to turn our schools, universities and communities into another arena of geopolitical confrontation.

If there are genuine and specific security concerns, these should be addressed through evidence-based investigations and appropriate safeguards—not through blanket suspicion of Chinese nationals, Filipino teachers in China, Chinese-language education or legitimate educational cooperation.

PLM also calls attention to the double standard at work. The Philippines hosts extensive military, security, academic and technological cooperation with the United States and other foreign powers. Yet exchanges involving China are increasingly being viewed through the lens of espionage and national security.

Whose security are we defending?

The Philippines must pursue an independent foreign policy based on national sovereignty and the interests of the Filipino people—not become a frontline state in the geopolitical rivalry of great powers.

PLM stands for peace, international solidarity, academic freedom and genuine people-to-people cooperation.

No to Sinophobia.
No to the militarisation of education.
No to using our schools as battlegrounds for great-power rivalry.
Yes to protecting Filipino teachers in China and Chinese teachers in the Philippines.
Yes to independent foreign policy and people-to-people solidarity.

PAKIKIBAKA PARA SA SOBERANYA.
PAKIKIBAKA PARA SA KAPAYAPAAN.

Educational exchanges are in the firing line as tensions between the two countries spill over into the classroom.

27/09/2026

On the Department of Foreign Affairs clarification

PLM notes the DFA’s clarification that the Philippine delegation did join the walkout during Benjamin Netanyahu’s UN address. But, even if this was the case, symbolic walkout is not enough and we reaffirm our demands.

If the Philippines is serious about Palestinian self-determination, its foreign policy must go beyond gestures: end military and security cooperation with Israel, impose meaningful sanctions, and use every available diplomatic and economic lever to demand an end to the genocide in Gaza.

Solidarity must be translated into action. SANCTION ISRAEL NOW!

Partido Lakas ng Masa (PLM) participated in the Ecosocialism 2026: Resistance, Decolonisation, and Liberation Conference...
27/09/2026

Partido Lakas ng Masa (PLM) participated in the Ecosocialism 2026: Resistance, Decolonisation, and Liberation Conference, held from 11 to 13 September 2026 in Magan-djin/Brisbane, Australia.

Organized by Socialist Alliance, Green Left for Ecosocialist Action, Resistance Books, and LINKS: International Journal of Socialist Renewal, the conference brought together more than 140 ecosocialist activists, intellectuals, and grassroots movements from across Asia, Latin America, and Australia. Discussions collectively analysed and confronted imperialism led by the United States and Trump, recolonisation, the rise of the far right, genocide and wars of aggression, and the ecocide that is worsening the destruction of the world. The conference also provided a space for activists to learn from each other, resist capitalism’s depravity and militarism, and build stronger movements for an ecosocialist alternative.

Representing PLM, National Council member and Youth Coordinator Khyl Ramos participated as a speaker in four panels: (1) Meet Asia’s New Left; (2) Climate Debt, Ecosocialism, and the Global South; (3) Gen Z Youth Revolts in the Region: What Can We Learn?; and (4) Closing Panel: The Way Forward.

Across the discussions, PLM brought experiences from the Philippines into a broader exchange on how local mass struggles can build towards transformative political action. The discussions reinforced that the climate crisis is deeply connected to capitalism, imperialism, and the unequal distribution of wealth and resources, with communities in the Global South bearing the enormous costs despite contributing least to the crisis. This makes climate justice inseparable from questions of climate debt, reparations, and a genuinely just and ecosocialist transition. At the same time, the undertakings of different movements highlighted the importance of political organization, socialist education, and turning mobilization into sustained grassroots power.

Ecosocialism 2026 provided PLM with an important space to share stories from the Philippines, learn from struggles across the region and beyond, and strengthen its links with ecosocialist activists internationally. More importantly, the conference solidified the basis for continued international solidarity and cooperation as PLM advances its work of building grassroots movements and organizing towards an ecosocialist alternative in the Philippines.


🇨🇺”Let the philosophy of plunder disappear, and the philosophy of war will have disappeared!” — Fidel CastroPLM shares t...
27/09/2026

🇨🇺”Let the philosophy of plunder disappear, and the philosophy of war will have disappeared!” — Fidel Castro

PLM shares the full statement of Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla to the 81st UN General Assembly, delivered exactly 66 years after Fidel Castro spoke those words from the same UN rostrum. Rodríguez renews that anti-imperialist call, denouncing imperialism and military aggression, economic warfare, sanctions and political intervention as instruments of domination—from Palestine and the Middle East, Iran to Latin America and the Caribbean. He denounces the US blockade of Cuba and reaffirms solidarity with peoples resisting colonialism, occupation and foreign domination.

Cuba speaks for us all! We stand with Cuba!
US Hands Off Cuba!
End the Criminal Blockade!
Cuba Si, Yankee No!

🇨🇺🗣 Statement by H.E. Mr. Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cuba, at the General Debate of the Eighty First Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations. New York, September 26, 2026.

Mr. President of the General Assembly;

Madam Deputy Secretary-General:

In approximately three hours, exactly 66 years will have elapsed since Commander in Chief Fidel Castro Ruz, in a memorable speech from this rostrum, said, and I quote: “Let the philosophy of plunder disappear, and the philosophy of war will have disappeared! Let the colonies disappear; let the exploitation of countries by monopolies disappear; and then humanity will have reached a true stage of progress!”.

However, the advance of expansionism, usurpation, conquest as well as military and economic aggressions are alarming. The US government aspiration to impose peace through force is absurd and unrealizable. The fundamental pillars of International Law and the United Nations Organization, such as the sovereign equality among States, are under permanent attack.

The genocidal crime of Zionism against the Palestinian people; the pirate attacks against vessels and the extrajudicial executions in the Caribbean Sea and some areas in the Pacific; the military aggression against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and the war against the Islamic Republic of Iran are new expressions of this atrocity.

They are also a reflection of the crisis of identity and relevance imposed on this United Nations Organization, and even on the General Assembly, the most universal, democratic and representative body of the international community.

We are convinced of the indispensable need to preserve and strengthen the United Nations, as we make it more democratic and effective; and of placing it closer to the peoples.

As is well known, in Cuba we are facing a multidimensional aggression from the United States government; a permanent, abusive and ruthless hostility that has lasted for almost seven decades already. Since January, 2026, this aggression has strengthened and become crueler and more dangerous, with the imposition of an energy blockade that, by resorting to intimidation and coercion, prevents any country from exporting fuel to Cuba -an equivalent to a naval blockade-, which is classified by International Law as an act of war.

Through the adoption of successive measures, the government of the United States has been applying new prohibitions on all countries with regard to products and services that cannot be exported or transported to Cuba. More than 7 thousand containers remain stranded in different ports; many of them are loaded with foodstuffs, medicines and medical devices or have even been paid for by Cuban private companies.

It is an unusual and unprecedented action. A superpower unilaterally deprives all States of their right to export the commodities that they wish to the country that they wish and continuously and comprehensively violates freedom of trade and navigation.

Added to this is the intimidation of entrepreneurs of different countries so that they abandon, against their will, their investments and businesses in Cuba; the obstacles and tricks to prevent the arrival of absolutely legitimate commercial shipments; the pressures to prevent the entry of visitors and tourists; and the efforts aimed at restricting as much as possible Cuba’s legitimate access to financing, technology and markets.

The United States has gone as far as to exert unsuspected pressures on sovereign governments so that they renounce the medical services they requested from us for the benefit of their respective populations and which are offered altruistically by Cuban professionals, because the US government is opposed to such cooperation, regardless of the impact and harm this may cause to those populations if they are deprived of free, quality medical care; that is to say, deprived of an elemental human right. On Thursday last, while this General Assembly was in session, the State Department convened a humiliating meeting, specifically with the States that are the recipients of this cooperation, in order to exert pressure and make threats.

According to the Secretary of State, the US official policy is to shut down every relief valve, block every possible way out and eliminate any form of survival for Cuba.

The impact of such an iron-clad and ruthless siege has a human face. The economic warfare is aimed against the people. It harms the Cuban people as a whole. It takes a toll on human lives. It causes individual and collective pain; it causes anguish. It is not “collateral damage”. It is a policy deliberately designed to wound the deepest sensibilities of Cuban families; disturb their wellbeing and hurt the dignity of the people.

It is an act of collective punishment; a crime proscribed by International Humanitarian Law. The obvious short-term goal pursued by such policy is to induce a humanitarian crisis in Cuba, which is also a crime.

The government of the United States and the US State Department have been forced to recognize the suffering inflicted on the Cuban people, but they have the impudence and cynicism to insist in putting the blame on the government of Cuba. The executioner blames the victim.

They are following the formula recommended by the State Department since 1960 in the infamous Mallory Memorandum, which established as an official policy, if force up until today, the overthrowing of the Cuban government through the economic suffocation and the extreme suffering of the Cuban people out of material shortages, hunger and desperation.

A few days ago, the President of the United States declared in this podium that Cuba was ‘a failed State’. If that were the case, why did they have to impose a fuel blockade? Why did they impose secondary sanctions? Why do they have to threaten, persecute and exert pressures on every State on the planet? He also recognized that his government is putting on Cuba the biggest pressure ever applied against any other State. A few months before, he had said that “all that is left is to go in and destroy everything.”

The threat of the use of military force against Cuba persists. This behavior is a violation of International Law and an infringement of the San Francisco Charter.

Should it materialize, it would be a major crime. It would cause the death of Cuban and American youths as well as huge destruction. We expect it never happens. Cuba will exercise, with utmost resolve and energy, its legitimate right to defend itself. This aggression is being accompanied by a brutal media and cognitive warfare aimed, not only against the Cuban people, but also against the US citizens and the international public opinion. It is characterized by its gross and brazen attempts to interfere in the internal affairs of Cuba, which likewise is another international crime.

We are often asked what is the US pursuing with such an aggressive behavior, and the question usually surprises us, because the representatives of that government have outrightly declared their purpose to take Cuba, control the country and dominate the economy. In other words, nullify, through an aggression or economic suffocation, the national sovereignty which several generations of Cubans have struggled for since the nineteenth century -first to achieve it, and later on, after conquering the full freedom in 1959, to tenaciously defend it against the biggest risks, including that of a holocaust.

The US behavior relies on the fallacy, proclaimed early on this year, that Cuba is an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and the foreign policy of the United States -a nonsense shamelessly repeated by that government. In a futile attempt to substantiate such an assertion, the US government inundates its huge communication platforms with false claims using the spokespersons and publications it hires and pays, taking advantage of the increasing control exercised by its government over them. The US President himself repeated it a few days ago in this room.

Any minimally informed observer would understand the unrealistic and evil intention to portray a relatively small and developing nation like Cuba, with a modest economic performance, as a threat to the biggest nuclear, military, technological and economic power in the planet.

This Organization and its member States have abundant evidence of the fact that we are a peace-loving country; of the efforts of Cuba in favor of international cooperation, understanding and the peaceful settlement of disputes as well as of the active role that we have played in support of the United Nations.

Cuba is not a threat, the blockade is!
Cuba is not a threat; the blockade certainly is!

We have always been and we will continue to be ready to engage in a dialogue with the government of the United States to try to find a solution to bilateral differences, on the basis of responsibility, respect, sovereign equality, the observance of International Law, without any interference in the internal affairs of States and without preconditions.
We are open to trade and business relations with United States companies, just as we are with those of any other country.

We are aware of the immense challenge our country faces in terms of its security, survival, the wellbeing of the people and the destiny of the homeland. We are not facing this challenge passively. We are doing it firmly and with dignity. Based on that, we are moving on in a process of changes that would lead to profound transformations of the economic and social model of the country, based on our historical experience.

On July 30 last, during the Seventh Session of the National People’s Power Assembly, President Miguel Díaz-Canel said: “In view of the complex situation I have described, how can we prevail in the construction of socialism? How could we find the material and financial resources needed to preserve the social achievements attained by the Revolution? As it already happened on former occasions, when we were faced with particularly complex situations -such as the Special Period-; when, under the guidance, first of Commander in Chief, and later of Army General Raúl Castro, the economic model was transformed to adapt it to the challenging foreign circumstances demanded by the times, under the leadership of the Party, in a collective and democratic way, in consultation with the people, without compromising the independence, the national sovereignty or the social achievements of the Revolution”, end of quote.

At that session, the National People’s Power Assembly adopted a new program, with new practices, actors and economic concepts. All of that is being done in accordance with the Constitution in force -. which was adopted through a free and universal referendum- and the conception of our socialist State of law and social justice.

As was pointed out by the leader of the Cuban Revolution, Army General Raúl Castro Ruz, the most important thing will be, and I quote: “the appropriate and timely implementation process, with well-defined priorities and the conscious participation of the people.”

This process relies on the strengths that we have built; the potential of our human resources and the determination to respond to the needs of the people with the greatest possible social justice, without ceasing in our efforts to defend, with utmost vigor and resolve, the sovereignty and the right to self-determination.

We know that we count on the support of the international community and the solidarity of millions, among them, an increasing number of US citizens.

That is reflected in the numerous gestures and statements in support of Cuba and against the abusive aggression. It is reflected in the fraternal material assistance received by our people, seeking to mitigate the huge damage caused to the Cuban economy and society.

That spirit of solidarity and empathy is also expressed with particular special emphasis among Cubans who reside permanently or temporarily outside the national territory and among their descendants, particularly here in the United States.

Mr. President;

We reject the Monroe Doctrine and its Corollaries as much as we refuse every attempt of imperialist militarization, intervention or domination in Latin America and the Caribbean, a region that was proclaimed as a Zone of Peace in 2014, precisely in Havana.

As a Small Island Developing State, we stand in solidarity with our brothers and sisters who share a similar condition and with their warning about the worrying and inexorable advance of climate change.

It is necessary to promote a governance that makes a more intensive use of the new ICTs, particularly the disruptive technologies, such as artificial intelligence.

We reject the implementation of unilateral coercive measures. We express our support to and solidarity with each and every nation which are victim of them.

We ratify our solidarity with the Government of National Reconciliation and Unity of Nicaragua.

We reiterate our support to the inalienable right of the people of Puerto Rico to self-determination and independence.

The sister nations of Africa and the Caribbean deserve a fair and differentiated treatment, as well as the reparations for the horrors of colonialism and the transatlantic slave trade.

We reaffirm our solidarity with the Saharan people and their right to self-determination.

We ratify our support to the “One China” principle.

We strongly believe that the current trend of international relations of disrespect for International Law and the United Nations, the imposition of the unilateral will of the mightiest over other countries by means of intimidation and coercion, is dangerous and unsustainable. The law of the jungle cannot be the future of humanity.

To prevent those practices, in addition of promoting peace and justice, the preceding generations founded the United Nations and for decades developed and tried to enrich its activity. Let us recover its role today, when we are perhaps in time to do so, before the Organization goes down in history as an unrealized dream of great promises.

In the year of the centennial birthday of Fidel Castro Ruz, the historical leader of the Cuban Revolution, let us be confident, as he was, that if we struggle with resolve, a better world will be possible.

Homeland or Death!
We Shall Overcome!

PLM condemns in the strongest possible terms the Philippine government UN delegation for remaining in the hall during th...
26/09/2026

PLM condemns in the strongest possible terms the Philippine government UN delegation for remaining in the hall during the speech of Benjamin Netanyahu while other delegations walked out in protest. Netanyahu is the butcher of Gaza — a war criminal wanted by the ICC. The Philippine government chose to stand with Netanyahu and his genocidal regime while more than 73,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza, including more than 20,000 children, and health and humanitarian workers have been killed while trying to save lives.
Yet the Philippine government continues to deepen ties with Israel, including defence-industry cooperation and new economic cooperation initiatives.
Our government cannot claim solidarity with Palestine while maintaining and expanding cooperation with Israel.
The Philippines will infamously go down in history for being in this list of shame.
PLM demands an independent Philippine foreign policy: end military and security cooperation with Israel, oppose the genocide in Gaza by sanctioning Israel, and stand unequivocally with the Palestinian people’s right to freedom, self-determination and justice.
Sanctions Now!
Down with neo-fascist Israel!

Tagalog version:Pandaigdigang kalagayan at panawagan sa pagbubuo ng rebolusyonaryong bloke ng mga pwersang panlipunan Ta...
26/09/2026

Tagalog version:

Pandaigdigang kalagayan at panawagan sa pagbubuo
ng rebolusyonaryong bloke ng mga pwersang panlipunan

Tayo ay nasa panahon ng “globalisadong digmaan”

Sa kasalukuyan, may hindi bababa sa tatlong larangan ang pumuputok na gyera:

Middle East: Ang pandirigma ng US/Israel laban sa Iran, kasabay ng patuloy na genocide ng Israel sa Gaza, tumitinding karahasan ng mga Israeli settler at okupasyon ng West Bank at South Lebanon, habang patuloy ang airstrikes ng mga pwersa ng Israel.

Europe: Ang digmaan ng NATO–Ukraine laban sa Russia ay isa nang European war, kasabay ng mga pangako ng NATO sa 2026 na 70 bilyong euro para sa kagamitang militar, tulong at pagsasanay sa Ukraine, habang patuloy na pinalalakas ang depensa sa eastern front nito. Bahagi ang digmaan ng mas malawak na tunggalian sa hinaharap ng kaayusang panseguridad sa Europe, ang papel ng NATO, estratehikong posisyon ng Russia, at balanse ng kapangyarihang militar sa Europe. May malawak itong epekto sa seguridad sa enerhiya, defense industry, mga sanction, produksyon ng armas, at alokasyon ng pampublikong yaman.

Indo-Pacific: Ang tumitinding estratehikong tunggalian ng US–China ay nakasentro sa hinaharap na balanse ng kapangyarihan sa rehiyon, kung saan ang Taiwan ay isang posibleng mitsa ng tunggalian. Umaabot ang kompetisyon sa South at East China Seas, mga military alliances, abanteng teknolohiya, kritikal na mineral, kalakalan, at estratehikong supply chains. Pinalalakas ng United States ang mga panrehiyong alyansa at kakayahang militar nito, habang pinalalawak naman ng China ang military at strategic na kapasidad nito. Dahil dito, ang Indo-Pacific ay nagiging sentral na arena sa mas malawak na tunggalian sa hinaharap na balanse ng kapangyarihang pang-ekonomiya, pang-teknolohiya at militar.

Ang mga larangang ito ng digmaan ay lalong nagkakaugnay sa pamamagitan ng mga alyansang militar, suplay ng armas, ruta ng enerhiya at shipping, mga sanction, teknolohiya, pinansya at pandaigdigang supply chains.

Dahil dito, lumalawak ang mga haka-haka kung ang magkakaugnay na mga digmaang ito ay maaaring humantong sa isang mas malawak na Digmaang Pandaigdig.

Ang nagbabagong balanse ng kapangyarihan sa daigdig

Sa kabila ng napakalaking superyoridad militar ng US, hinahamon ang hegemonya nito sa daigdig. Nagbabago ang pandaigdigang balanse ng kapangyarihang pang-ekonomiya, pang-teknolohiya at pampulitika.

Umuusbong ang China bilang isang pangunahing kapangyarihang pang-ekonomiya at teknolohikal. Hinamon ng Russia ang post-Cold War European security order. Nilabanan ng Iran ang pagsasailalim nito sa isang kaayusan sa Middle East na dominado ng US.

Epektibong gumuho ang US security order sa Middle East, kasabay ng mga pag-atake ng Iran at pagkawasak ng mga base militar ng US sa Gulf states, pagkontrol ng Ansarallah (Houthis) sa mga bahagi ng baybayin ng Yemen sa Red Sea, paggambala nito sa mga ruta ng Saudi Arabia para sa pagpapadala ng langis, at direktang pag-atake sa paliparan ng Riyadh.

Sa Lebanon, patuloy na lumalaban at nakikipaglaban sa Israel ang Hezbollah.

Sa buong Global South, lalong naghahangad ang mga bansa ng mas malawak na estratehikong awtonomiya sa halip na eksklusibong pumila sa Washington o sa isa pang pangunahing kapangyarihan (maliban sa mga bansang tulad ng Pilipinas).

Malaki ang pampulitikang epekto ng mga kilusang masa ng paglaban—ang Palestine Solidarity movement, climate justice movements, at iba pa.

Ang paglago ng demokratikong sosyalistang pulitika sa United States ay isang mahalagang indikasyon ng muling pag-igting ng kaliwa at sosyalistang pulitika. Sa US, ang lumalaking mga kilusan hinggil sa karapatan ng mga manggagawa, healthcare, pabahay, climate action at serbisyong publiko ay nagpapakita ng malawakang pagkadismaya sa hindi pagkakapantay-pantay, kapangyarihan ng mga korporasyon, at mga limitasyon ng neoliberal na pulitika.

Sa Berlin, ang makasaysayang tagumpay sa eleksyon ng Die Linke, partido ng sosyalistang kaliwa, ay nagpamalas ng malakas na pagsulong sa mga distritong manggagawa. Ang tagumpay ay likha ng magkakasabay na mga pakikibaka hinggil sa gastos sa pabahay, walang-katiyakang trabaho, hindi pagkakapantay-pantay at presyur sa mga serbisyong publiko – bagamat nagaganap din ang mas malawak na pag-angat ng pwersa ng extreme right.

Ipinakikita ng mga pangyayaring ito ang panibagong paghahanap ng mga alternatibong pampulitika na nakabatay sa mga pangangailangang panlipunan at demokratikong kontrol.

Hindi awtomatikong nagbubunga ng kontrol pampulitika ang superyoridad sa militar

Ang sentral na kontradiksyon ng kontemporaryong imperyalismo o pandaigdigang kapitalismo ay ang napakalaking superyoridad militar nito ay hindi awtomatikong nagbubunga ng kontrol pampulitika o pang-ekonomiya.

Sa Afghanistan at Iraq, nakapagpakilos ang United States ng napakalaking puwersang militar, nagpabagsak ng umiiral na mga gobyerno at sumakop ng teritoryo, ngunit hindi nito basta-basta nadiktahan ang pampulitikang kinabukasan ng alinmang bansa.

Inilalantad ng kasalukuyang tunggalian sa Iran ang parehong pundamental na kontradiksyon.

Maaaring may kakayahan ang US at Israel na wasakin ang napakalaking bahagi ng imprastrakturang militar ng Iran. Ngunit ang pagkawasak sa pamamagitan ng puwersang militar ay hindi humantong sa regime change sa Iran at hindi awtomatikong nagtakda sa pampulitikang kinabukasan ng Iran o ng mas malawak na Middle East.

Mahalagang halimbawa ang Cuba ng isang maliit na bansang naggigiit ng pambansang soberanya at nagsusulong ng independiyenteng landas pampulitika sa kabila ng tuluy-tuloy na panlabas na presyur. Ipinakikita rin ng karanasan nito ang kahalagahan ng internasyonal na solidaridad.

Kayang manira ng kapangyarihang militar. Ngunit sa sarili lamang nito, hindi nito kayang lumikha ng lehitimong kapangyarihang pampulitika, katatagang panlipunan o isang sustenableng kaayusang panrehiyon.

Ang Global South ay sentral na larangang pampulitika

Ang mga mamamayan ng Global South, na may pinakamaliit na impluwensya sa mga geopolitikal na desisyon ng mga pangunahing kapangyarihan, ang kadalasang nagdurusa sa ilan sa pinakamabibigat na epekto ng mga ito.

Malinaw itong ipinakikita ng kasalukuyang energy shock. Maaaring guluhin ng tunggalian sa Middle East ang suplay ng langis, shipping routes at pandaigdigang merkado libu-libong kilometro ang layo mula sa aktuwal na larangan ng digmaan.

Naipapasa ang mga epekto sa pamamagitan ng isang sunud-sunod na presyur sa ekonomiya:

Mula digmaan → tungo sa pagkagambala sa enerhiya → pagtaas ng presyo ng gasolina → implasyon → pagtaas ng presyo ng pagkain at transportasyon → at mas mabigat na pasanin sa mga manggagawa at maralitang komunidad.

Pinagbabayad ang mga mamamayan ng Global South para sa isang sitwasyong hindi naman nila nilikha.

Kasabay nito, nahaharap ang mga bansa sa presyur na dagdagan ang gastusing militar at pumila sa sinumang magkakatunggaling geopolitikal na mga bloke.

Ang mga yamang maaari sanang ilaan sa kalusugan, edukasyon, pabahay, proteksyong panlipunan, imprastraktura at climate adaptation ay sa halip lalong inililihis tungo sa militarisasyon.

Enerhiya, digmaan at klima

Inilalantad din ng tunggalian sa Middle East ang kahinaan ng pandaigdigang ekonomiyang nakasentro sa fossil fuel.

Lalong nagiging malinaw ang ugnayan:

Mula pagdepende sa fossil fuel → tungo sa geopolitikal na kompetisyon → militarisasyon → digmaan → pagkagambala sa enerhiya → at krisis pang-ekonomiya at panlipunan.

Lumilikha naman ang climate change ng isa pang cycle na nagpapatindi sa krisis:

Mula pagkasira ng klima → tungo sa mga sakuna at displacement → kawalan ng seguridad sa pagkain at enerhiya → kawalang-katatagang panlipunan → at tunggaliang pampulitika at militarisasyon.

Hindi maaaring ituring na magkakahiwalay ang mga prosesong ito.

Itinuturo ng mga ito ang isang mahalagang pagtatagpo ng mga pampulitikang pwersa:

Anti-war movement + climate justice + karapatan ng mga manggagawa.

Pilipinas: nasa abanteng hanay at bulnerableng frontline sa globalisadong digmaan

Ang lumalalim na integrasyon ng Pilipinas sa istrukturang militar ng US ay nagbabantang gawing abanteng posisyon ang bansa sa isang mas malawak na globalisadong digmaan. Dahil malapit ito sa Taiwan at South China Sea, nagiging estratehiko—at bulnerable—ang mga base, pantalan, paliparan at communications infrastructure ng Pilipinas.

Ang bulnerabilidad na ito sa larangang militar ay lalo pang pinatitindi ng pagdepende sa enerhiya at pagkakalantad sa climate change: ang pagkagambala sa suplay ng gasolina at shipping ay maaaring mabilis na magpataas ng presyo ng enerhiya at pagkain, habang ang mga bagyo, pagbaha at pagtaas ng sea level ay nagbabanta sa mahahalagang imprastraktura at kabuhayan.

Samakatwid, ang panganib ay hindi lamang na maaaring maging military frontline ang Pilipinas, kundi maaari ring magsanib ang mga kahinaan nito sa militar, enerhiya at klima, habang ang mga manggagawang Pilipino at ang masa ang pinagbabayad sa agresyon ng imperyalismong US.

Mula sa mga digmaang imperyalista tungo sa sosyalistang alternatiba

Ang krisis ng umiiral na imperyalistang kaayusan ay hindi malulutas sa simpleng pagpapalit lamang ng isang bloke ng malalaking kapangyarihan ng isa pang bloke.

Hindi rin ito malulutas sa pamamagitan ng walang katapusang pagpapalawak ng militar, permanenteng war economies at kompetisyon para sa kontrol sa mga estratehikong yaman.

Ang alternatiba ay kailangang sosyalistang internasyonalismo: kooperasyon ng mga mamamayan at manggagawa sa ibayong mga pambansang hangganan sa halip na kompetisyon ng mga estado at naghaharing uri para sa kontrol sa mga natitirang yaman.

Ilalagay ng isang sosyalistang alternatiba ang pangangailangan ng tao higit sa kapangyarihang militar at pribadong akumulasyon.

Ang papel ng rebolusyonaryong pulitika

Ang papel ng rebolusyonaryong pulitika ay hindi lamang hulaan kung ang kasalukuyang mga tunggalian ay mauuwi sa isang digmaang pandaigdig.

Dapat unawain ang istruktural na krisis na lumilikha sa mga tunggaliang ito at organisahin ang mamamayan tungo sa isang alternatiba.

Ang tungkulin ay pag-ugnayin ang mga pakikibakang madalas ituring na magkakahiwalay:

¥ laban sa digmaan at militarisasyon;
¥ para sa karapatan ng mga manggagawa at demokratikong kontrol;
¥ para sa climate justice;
¥ para sa demokrasya at soberanya;
¥ laban sa kahirapan, hindi pagkakapantay-pantay at pagsasamantala;
¥ para sa karapatan ng mga migrante at displaced peoples;
¥ para sa pambansa at popular na soberanya; at
¥ para sa kapayapaan at internasyonal na solidaridad.

Para sa mga manggagawa at mamamayan ng Global South, nangangahulugan ito ng pagtatayo ng isang independiyenteng kilusang pampulitika.

Ang independensya ay hindi nangangahulugan ng pampulitikang neutralidad sa harap ng pang-aapi o digmaan. Nangangahulugan ito ng pagpapaunlad ng kakayahang pampulitika ng mga manggagawa at mamamayan na tukuyin ang sarili nilang mga interes at sarili nilang kinabukasan.

Ang layunin ay hindi lamang tutulan ang susunod na digmaan, ipaglaban ang climate justice, o ikampanya ang energy democracy bilang magkakahiwalay na pakikibaka.

Ang layunin ay buuin ang mga puwersang panlipunan at pampulitika na may kakayahang lumikha ng alternatiba sa sistemang patuloy na lumilikha ng digmaan, pagsasamantala, hindi pagkakapantay-pantay at krisis ekolohikal.

Nangangailangan ito ng pagbabago sa mga watak-watak na pakikibaka tungo sa isang nagkakaisang proyektong pampulitika.

Panawagan para sa isang rebolusyonaryong bloke ng mga pwersang panlipunan

Ito ang dahilan kung bakit kailangan nating manawagan para sa isang rebolusyonaryong bloke ng mga pwersang panlipunan.

Ang ganitong bloke ay hindi dapat tingnan bilang simpleng alyansang elektoral o koalisyon lamang ng umiiral na mga organisasyong pampulitika.

Dapat itong unawain bilang isang panlipunan at pampulitikang alyansa ng mga puwersang may kakayahang hamunin ang sistema.

Samakatwid, ang hamon sa ating lahat ay higit na mabigat kaysa pagtugon lamang sa isang digmaan o sa isang partikular na manipestasyon ng krisis ng pandaigdigang sistemang kapitalista.

Ang tungkulin ng rebolusyonaryong pulitika ay baguhin ang krisis na ito mula sa pinagmumulan ng takot at pangamba, pagkakahati-hati at reaksyon – tungo sa isang oportunidad para sa kolektibong pag-oorganisang pampulitika na hahantong sa pagtatayo ng Gobyerno ng Masa at pagbubukas sa alternatibang sistema ng sosyalismo.

Ito ang pampulitikang batayan para sa pagtatayo ng isang rebolusyonaryong bloke ng mga puwersang panlipunan ngayon – sa pandaigdigan at pambansang antas.

PLM International
Setyembre 26, 2026

Address


Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when PLM - Partido Lakas ng Masa posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to PLM - Partido Lakas ng Masa:

Shortcuts

  • Want your organization to be the top-listed government service?

Share