Justice For Avinash Ramkistan

28/10/2026

🚨 AVINASH RAMKISTAN’S CASE: SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS OF CORRUPTION AND JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT! ⚖️

4 BAIL DENIALS. NO SIGNED REASONS. NO ARRESTING OFFICER TESTIFYING. A DEFENCE THAT ALLEGEDLY WASN’T ALLOWED TO BE PRESENTED. IS THIS JUSTICE?

🔴 BAIL: Denied four times without signed reasons, preventing Avinash from properly appealing those decisions.

🔴 ARREST: The arresting officer never testified. She admitted the arrest was instructed by a prosecutor.

🔴 INVESTIGATOR: He allegedly claimed to be a Hawks member, yet Hawks/DPCI confirmation reportedly indicated otherwise.

🔴 EVIDENCE: The investigator allegedly admitted it did not exist, and if it did it does not establish that Avinash created or was responsible for it.

🔴 RETALIATION: Khuzwayo allegedly admitted that her reason was because Avinash had opened charges against her and that he had not breached her protection order.

🔴 CRIMINAL INTENT: The State allegedly acknowledged that Avinash’s intention was to pursue the lawful nolle prosequi process. Where is the criminal intent in pursuing a lawful legal remedy?

🔴 DEFENCE BLOCKED: Avinash maintains that the magistrate declined to properly place his defence heads and Section 174 application before the court and refused to allow him to present defence evidence.

THREE MAGISTRATES. SERIOUS QUESTIONS. ONE MAN’S FREEDOM AT STAKE.

Avinash alleges that his case was fabricated and that serious misconduct occurred throughout the proceedings.

Was he prosecuted for criminal conduct, or was he targeted for challenging people within the justice system?

Why were bail reasons withheld? Why did the arresting officer not testify? Why are the investigator’s credentials in question? Why was the defence allegedly prevented from presenting its case?

⚖️ THESE ARE NOT QUESTIONS THAT SHOULD BE IGNORED.

Avinash Ramkistan deserves a fair hearing, proper consideration of his defence and accountability for any proven misconduct.

📢 SHARE THIS. DEMAND ANSWERS. DEMAND TRANSPARENCY. DEMAND JUSTICE FOR AVINASH

23/10/2026

🚨 AVINASH RAMKISTAN WAS ARRESTED WITHOUT A WARRANT! WATCH THIS VIDEO! 🚨

Avinash Ramkistan was arrested without a warrant, even though the alleged charge of intimidation requires one, proving that his arrest was unlawful.

NO ARRESTING OFFICER TESTIFIED!

The arresting officer never testified, leaving no proper foundation for the State's case regarding the lawfulness of the arrest.

THE INVESTIGATOR LIED ABOUT BEING A HAWKS MEMBER!

The Hawks/DPCI confirmed that he was not a Hawks member. What does this tell us about the investigation and the credibility of those involved?

THIS ENTIRE CASE REVEALS SERIOUS CORRUPTION!

Why? Because Avinash Ramkistan stated that the Judge President was behind the corruption, and she has refrained from providing the correspondence authorising Advocate Khuzwayo to act as a judge.

THINK ABOUT THE SERIOUSNESS OF THIS!

If Avinash is right, it means the Durban High Court could be captured by corruption, with cases potentially being decided unfairly. The public deserves to know the truth!

Avinash also alleged that the NPA was concealing these crimes by refusing to prosecute them, which led to his request for a nolle prosequi certificate so that he could pursue private prosecution under sections 7 and 8 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

IF AVINASH RAMKISTAN IS RIGHT, THIS CASE COULD EXPOSE THE CORRUPTION THAT THE PUBLIC DESERVES TO SEE!

Is this why he was arrested? Is this what the public is not being told?

WATCH THE VIDEO. SHARE IT. LET THE PUBLIC DECIDE.

South Africans deserve answers. Nobody should be above the law, and nobody should be punished for exposing corruption.

THE TRUTH MUST COME OUT!

22/10/2026

21/10/2026

🚨 WHY WAS AVINASH RAMKISTAN ARRESTED? THE QUESTIONS SOUTH AFRICA NEEDS TO ASK! 🇿🇦

For those who don't know, Avinash alleged that corruption had infiltrated the Durban courts, NPA and SAPS. He questioned whether advocates were being placed to predetermine cases while serving as acting High Court judges, and whether they had been properly appointed.

🔥 Avinash opened criminal complaints alleging corruption. Anticipating that the NPA would decline prosecution, he invoked his rights under Sections 7 and 8 of the Criminal Procedure Act, concerning private prosecution.

He also relied on Section 42 of the CPA, asserting a right to arrest suspects under the circumstances he believed applied.

⚖️ HIS DEMAND? Let the Judge President produce the correspondence relating to the acting judges' appointments and answer the questions raised.

Avinash warned that if courts are corrupt or captured, ordinary South Africans may never receive justice.

IS THIS THE FIGHT BEHIND HIS ARREST? WHY HAS HE BEEN SILENCED FOR SO LONG?

These are serious allegations demanding transparent answers, not silence. One should not have to beg or threaten for their own statutory rights.

🇿🇦 NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. NOT EVEN THOSE WHO ADMINISTER IT. JUSTICE MUST BE SEEN TO BE DONE!

20/10/2026

🇿🇦 REMEMBER THIS GUY? WHERE ARE YOU NOW?

Avinash Ramkistan! Known for his wicked hairstyles, permanent smile, brilliant mind, and kind, loving nature.

Some of us know him personally. WE KNOW AVINASH, AND WE KNOW HE IS INCAPABLE OF CRIME! He has always been known for standing up against wrongful acts.

His career was taken from him. He was debarred from earning a living in his chosen profession for 10 YEARS, and his assets were taken away.

WHO WOULDN'T FIGHT FOR A CAREER THEY LOVE? WHO WOULDN'T FIGHT TO RECLAIM THEIR LIFE?

Avinash demanded information about an advocate's appointment as a judge, alleging irregularities. He challenged the NPA over cases allegedly dismissed without proper investigation. He fought for his statutory right to private prosecution and a nolle prosequi certificate under sections 7 and 8 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

THEN CAME THE CRIMINAL CHARGES ALLEGING INTIMIDATION AND THREATS.

🔥 WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL INTENT?

🔥 WHY WAS THE INFORMATION HE REQUESTED NOT PROVIDED?

🔥 WHY ARE THE ISSUES HE RAISED NOT BEING PROPERLY EXAMINED?

AND WHAT ABOUT HIS FAMILY?

His mother has suffered TWO HEART ATTACKS. His father continues visiting and supporting his son while enduring enormous stress. An entire family is suffering while Avinash remains behind bars.

Remember, this is someone's son. Someone's family. A human being whose career, livelihood, freedom and family life have been devastated.

Avinash raised serious issues during his trial. Those questions deserve transparent and proper examination.

🇿🇦 HOW CAN WE REMAIN SILENT?

Today it is Avinash. Tomorrow, who will stand up for YOUR rights?

✊ SHARE HIS STORY. DEMAND TRANSPARENCY. DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY.

JUSTICE FOR AVINASH RAMKISTAN!

18/10/2026

🚨REMEMBER THIS NEWSPAPER ARTICLE?

R100 MILLION+ IN CIVIL CLAIMS. ALLEGED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. A WHISTLEBLOWER WHO SAYS HE WAS SILENCED. SOUTH AFRICA DESERVES ANSWERS. 🚨

WHO BENEFITS WHEN THE PERSON RAISING THE ALARM ENDS UP BEHIND BARS?

📰 The original article tells only part of the story!

⚖️ R74.6 MILLION against the FSCA for an allegedly unlawful 10-year debarment.

⚖️ R32 MILLION against Lion of Africa and Brimstone for alleged breach of contract.

💰 TOTAL: R106.6 MILLION!

Avinash Ramkistan alleges misconduct involving LTC Harms, chairperson of the FSCA Tribunal, and questions the circumstances surrounding his debarment.

He also challenges Advocate Khuzwayo's judicial status and authority, alleging connections to the Arbitration Foundation of Southern Africa, and questions her handling of his two civil cases.

🚨 THE BIGGER QUESTION: Avinash maintains that his complaints against officials and attempts to exercise his statutory rights to pursue private prosecution were followed by retaliatory prosecution and corruption involving the NPA.

He strongly believes his prolonged arrest and detention may allow his R106.6 million civil claims to prescribe, potentially depriving him of the opportunity to pursue them.

🇿🇦 Are these matters connected?

Were potential conflicts of interest properly examined? Who will independently investigate these allegations?

A conviction does not automatically resolve separate allegations of misconduct. The evidence deserves scrutiny, and the public deserves answers.

📢 SHARE THE ARTICLE. ASK QUESTIONS. DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY!

12/10/2026

🚨 AVINASH RAMKISTAN: A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE?

Avinash had his business taken and destroyed cowboy style, totalling R32 million. He accused a former Deputy President of the SCA, also Chairman of the FSCA, of corruption.

He was then debarred for 10 years, unable to earn a living, despite no court ordering it.

He brought three cases, including that Standard Bank withdraw repossessions across SA for breaches of Section 131 of the NCA, helping millions of us South Africans. These cases were heard by an advocate acting as a High Court judge.

Avinash questioned her appointment by the Durban Judge President and opened corruption charges, but the NPA declined to prosecute.

He fought for private prosecution under Sections 6 and 7 of the CPA, alleging the NPA drops cases thereby covering up crimes. He also stated he would arrest suspects under Section 42 due to SAPS linked to crimes.

He was then arrested by the very NPA officials he had challenged. He alleges retaliation.

Denied bail four times, he says he was trapped in a bail loop, unable to appeal effectively. At trial, he claims he proved his innocence while the court failed to abide by the law.

On the day he was sentenced, his mother suffered two heart attacks.

Avinash is being silenced while fighting for rights we should all enjoy. His case raises disturbing questions about corruption and accountability inside the very courts where we seek justice.

WHO HOLDS THE SYSTEM ACCOUNTABLE?

📢 JUSTICE FOR AVINASH RAMKISTAN.

03/10/2026

AVINASH RAMKISTAN — LET THE RECORD SPEAK

Avinash questioned the appointment of an advocate acting as a judge and says the Durban court and Judge President failed to provide proof of her lawful appointment.

He was later arrested without a warrant after seeking a private prosecution, alleging NPA corruption.

At trial, Avinash maintains:

• No arresting officer testified.
• The investigator was not a Hawks member.
• He allegedly admitted the evidence did not exist and was not Avinash's.
• Witnesses admitted the charges were retaliatory.
• 4 of 5 witnesses said they never opened charges.

Most importantly, Avinash maintains the State failed to prove the essential elements of ANY charge, including mens rea (criminal intent).

He says the State admitted his actions followed a lawful nolle prosequi process.

He was also denied bail 4 times and maintains he was wrongfully arrested, detained and denied a fair trial.

These are serious allegations. So show the record.

SHOW THE EVIDENCE.
SHOW THE CHARGES.
SHOW THE APPOINTMENT.
SHOW THE BAIL REASONS.

LET THE RECORD SPEAK.